It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UK's national terrorism threat level has been raised to "critical", Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has said.
The announcement came after a meeting of the government emergencies committee Cobra, following a burning car being driven into a Glasgow airport terminal.
Originally posted by budski
Seems Mr. Brown is taking this very seriously indeed.
Baptism of fire for the new PM, but I'm pretty sure he's a guy who can handle it.
[edit on 30/6/2007 by budski]
Originally posted by budski
Perhaps not - but we can try
Remember - the purpose of terrorism is to terrorise.
If we give in to it, they win
Originally posted by steve99
If it keeps up long enough, muslims will be put into interment camps. How long do you think terrorism will go on before it happens, and how long before the people of England will allow it to keep happening.
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by steve99
If it keeps up long enough, muslims will be put into interment camps. How long do you think terrorism will go on before it happens, and how long before the people of England will allow it to keep happening.
Sorry mate, but I think you may be a bit wide of the mark there.
It could never happen under the human rights act.
If they are to be detained, there must be solid proof that they are involved in terrorist activities.
And if there is real proof? - Let them rot in jail, the murdering gits
Originally posted by budski
Sorry mate, but I think you may be a bit wide of the mark there.
It could never happen under the human rights act.
If they are to be detained, there must be solid proof that they are involved in terrorist activities.
And if there is real proof? - Let them rot in jail, the murdering gits
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by budski
Sorry mate, but I think you may be a bit wide of the mark there.
It could never happen under the human rights act.
If they are to be detained, there must be solid proof that they are involved in terrorist activities.
And if there is real proof? - Let them rot in jail, the murdering gits
The Human Rights Act can be suspended if they declare a State of Emergency. They can do a surprisingly large amount of stuff if they do that.....
Originally posted by budski
hmmm
salient points seem to be about an opt out clause - what's your point?
There's very little in that report that agree/disagree with - it's all a bit ambiguous
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by budski
hmmm
salient points seem to be about an opt out clause - what's your point?
There's very little in that report that agree/disagree with - it's all a bit ambiguous
Point being that the Human rights Act isn't worth the paper it's written on if a State of Emergency is declared.
And of course it's ambiguous. Makes it easier to do what you like then!