It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pavil
The only reason the surrender of Japan went so peacefully is beacause of the Emperor. Talk to a vet who was there right after the war if you doubt me. The Emperor was almost considered divine and had to be obeyed.
Wow, I will leave you to your beliefs on that one.
History proves otherwise.
Yes Russia did the yeomans work in the war, but Truman in no way could have stopped it, nor was he responsible for every casualty of that war.
And if you want to really look at an immoral and inhumane man Look into your own Russian leader in WWII. Stalin was a maniac.
Very debatable, again ask a vet who was there about the arms caches they found all over the place.
We can make an educated guess, which is what the Generals did in 1945. Take a look at the battle of Okinawa, the first homeland Island of Japan that was attacked.
en.wikipedia.org...
Don't try and tell me that the Japanese wouldn't have fought harder on the Big Islands.
Originally posted by Foxe
Japan was also within weeks of their own nuclear weapon working...even some on the team claim (unsupported) that they tested in South Korea's coast line.
I stand by my remarks of previous post.
EDIT: I do want to mention, Japan was months from having thousands of jets in working, war operation.
They would have wiped our navy off the ocean. Then took the fighting to us, island by island.
Our nuclear weapons were delivered via high alt B-29, however, Jets could get to them. Thus, eliminating the nuclear threat.
All jet factories were under mountains, our A-Bombs were not powerful enough to hurt those factories.
I stand by my remarks.
Originally posted by FredT
Now I could be nieve and suggest they wer elooking for ways to protect the radiation victems, but the reality is that they wanted to see what the short / lonbg term implications were in an city environment.
What exactly did you expect them to do? They had already left people in place in the fallout zone of the Trinity blast. (Several ranchers were missed in the inital sweep and were left in place to study)
Originally posted by StellarX
The Japanese took most of the islands unopposed.
Well you can argue it takes arrogance but as far as i am concerned it's just a fact and one i can prove with not much effort.
Stellar
Originally posted by StellarX
The only reason the war against Japan ever started is because Truman and his 'gang' did not want to share their imperialistic gains and decided that they were in favourable position to blockade Japan and end their strategic ambitions.
I have studied my history and until the majority of the people on this thread start doing so don't expect much other than what you are now reading.
Two cities of no strategic significance with no evidence in sight that the US had more such bombs to drop. "
know about Okinawa and the casualties and the reckless way in which Japanese defenses were attacked head on for no good reason at all. The fact is that in modern wars you need rifles and bullets and those are not made from sand or by wishing for them.
The Japanese had demonstrated in each case they would not surrender and they would fight to the death. It was expected that resistance in japan with thier home ties would be even more severe.
---General Marshall
If the US did not want to risk a invasion they could have just let Stalin do as the SU were both able and willing to conduct such a operation in late 1945.
The Atomics bombs were simply not required to force the Japanese surrender
Originally posted by StellarX
They might have tried but 'trying' without artillery, armor, or rifle ammunition in general is simply not good enough. Japan could not have gone on like that and this was VERY evident when they surrendered before anyone even set foot on one of the four major home Islands.
Originally posted by FredT
Truman was not the President when the war with Japan began. You seem to have a very strange concept about war. You suggesting after 5 years of war "sharing"? :shk:
Yes you have studied history, but I suspect its of the revisionist sort. No matter. I have also studied the era with a focus on energy and the development of the Atomic bomb, so in this area I feel I am pretty well versed.
Really now? Setting aside the fact that destroying entire cities was part and parcel with the acceptable standards of war during that time (its sheer folly to try to slap on present day morality and values with actions in the past......
But then again its part and parcel for the revisionist historian ) Five cities were actually chose. All had strategic value of some sort or another.
Kyoto: Industry, port, and population base
Hirsohima: Army depot, port (It also had a good radar target and it was felt the surrounding mountains could help focus the blast.
Yokohama (Same reasons as above)
Kokura Arsenal (This one is self explanatory eh)
Nagasaki and Niigata as well.
They did discuss taking out the emperor but that was quickly shelved.
Secretary of War Stimson nixed Kyoto after it was chosen as the first target due to its cultural signifigance
So to imply that the cities chose were throwaways is simplitic at best.
Hmmm not just on Okinawa eh? Almost every island they took faught bitterly.
The Japanese had demonstrated in each case they would not surrender and they would fight to the death. It was expected that resistance in japan with thier home ties would be even more severe.
---General Marshall
Okinawa was an important part of the island hopping strategy.
To date you have gone out of your way to point out what you seem to percieve as a flawed strategy of chopping the Greated East Asian Co Properity Shprere down to size yet offer no other solution. let me quess, the US was to sail the seventh fleet right into Tokyo Bay and declare victory?
Okay how exacly were the Soviets supposed to invade the home islands. Please enlighten me on thier huge Gator navy they possesed in this time frame? Yes they could have sent bombers out but invade? Not likely.
The Japanese were sent the text of the Potsam Declaration which in essence called for unconditional surrender at 0700 July 27th. It was rejected:
As for the government, it does not find any important value to it, and there is no other recource but to ignore it entirely and resolutely fight for the successful conclution of the war ----- Prime Minister Baron Kantaro Suzuki
You have mad mention several times in your posts that YOU have read history and implied that the rest of us have not (At least those opposed to your version of events).
I am begining to wonder. Revisonist history is always 20/20 depending on ones point of view.
If you look at the events of WWII in the context of the times, it really paints a different picture eh?
Originally posted by FredT
Wow you are 100% right.........
oh wait, lets take a look at Iraq circa 2007? Please explain how these poor under equipped rebels are bascially holding off
the most high tech and power army the world has ever seen?
Couple the fanatism of Al Queda terrorist with a largely mountainous country,
and a population willing to fight down to the last man.
At least in Iraq some are sypathetic to our aims.
How many in WWII Japan would have been?
The effort was led by Yoshio Nishina. By the summer of 1944 he had managed to produce 170 grams of uranium hexafloride. by compariosn the US was making the substance by the ton. (Taken from The making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes) they never were able to get much in the way of separating fissile uranium with their cyclotrons.
StellarX asked:
So why did the thousands of German jets not save Germany? Care to explain where these planes would have been flying from, and i am sure they did not exist but lets pretend, or who would have been flying them? Why did the Japanese only have two operation jets in August 1945 and why were they still busy flight testing them?
Originally posted by FredT
Really now? Setting aside the fact that destroying entire cities was part and parcel with the acceptable standards of war during that time (its sheer folly to try to slap on present day morality and values with actions in the past...... But then again its part and parcel for the revisionist historian ) Five cities were actually chose. All had strategic value of some sort or another.
Kyoto: Industry, port, and population base
Originally posted by vox2442
The only reason to hit it would be to destroy the cultural heart of Japan. Kind of like taking out vatican city or something.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Put simply the U-boat carrying examples and blueprints was sunk in 1944. However a less powerful Campini jet engine did reach Japan and it was this which was copied. Also the B-29 raids and later raids by Mustangs and naval fighters destroyed all of Japan's industrial infrastructure by April 1945.
Still the generals would not relinquish the fight. Yes the Soviets in Manchuria were a compelling reason, but the Japanese high command still would not surrender to the Americans until the A-bombs were used.
In a sense had they not been used Japan would have gone on fighting.
In a strategic sense the A-bombs were used to prevent Russia gaining the Japanese home islands. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the first victims of the cold War as well as the last victims of WW2.
Truman only knew that Germany had been supplying uranium to Japan during 1944 and that somewhere Japan had it's own A-bomb project. B-29s were ordered to demolish any and every industrial target in Japan, by which time the Japanese A-bomb project was hidden in Korea.
Responding to Badge01, Bombing of Norsk Hydro and later the Telemark ferry was a setback but not fatal for the German nuclear effort. Nazis were also producing heavy water at their Beck Plant in Germany. Heavy water is important for reactors which breed plutonium for bombs.
This rather underscores the myth that Heisenberg was only developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Ha ... sounds like Iran today.
Germany also had a second path to the A-bomb with Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) for a Uranium A-bomb.
Originally posted by FredT
Its late Stellar and multiple quote repsonces from the both of us is past my tired brain so I will have to get back to you on some of what you said manyana
It really simple a " targeting Committe" had selected these cities and LeMay was told not to attack them in force:
The Committee composed of
General Thomas F. Farrell
British Physicist William G. Penney
John Von Neumann - scientist
One unammed Colonel and one unamed Major
After 2 hours of bombardment, Tokyo was engulfed in a firestorm. The fires were so hot they would ignite the clothing on individuals as they were fleeing. Many women were wearing what were called 'air-raid turbans' around their heads and the heat would ignite those turbans like a wick on a candle. This was the worst disaster for Tokyo since the 1923 earthquake. The death toll was at least 80,000, and perhaps exceeded 100,000.[4] This may have been the most devastating single raid ever carried out by aircraft in any war including the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and the firebombing of Dresden.
Around 16 square miles (41 km²) of the city were destroyed in the firestorm. The destruction and damage was at its worst in the city sections east of the Imperial Palace. In the following two weeks there were almost 1,600 further sorties against the four cities, destroying 31 square miles (80 km²) in total at a cost of 22 aircraft. There was a third raid on Tokyo on May 26. The firebombing technique was highly successful and was a large morale boost to the U.S. air force.
The firebomb raids were not the only raids on Tokyo; there were more regular raids using conventional high explosives. With the capture of Okinawa, the Eighth Air Force was transferred there from Europe and began its own raids. Monthly tonnage dropped on Japan had increased from 13,800 short tons in March to 42,700 tons in July ( 38,700 metric tons), and was planned to have continued to increase to around 115,000 short tons (105,000 metric tons) per month.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by StellarX
It's going to take quite a lot of convincing to show me that this was anything other than a inhuman, but that is readily obvious from many of their other actions, science experiment that they felt they had to get done before signing the peace agreements.