It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
I watched "Out of the Blue" last night, and it was good too, but I noticed they stopped just short of taking an accusatory tone against "the government".
Originally posted by yeti101
terrible ufo documentary- one of the worst ive ever seen. Rods lol
Originally posted by yeti101
oh the rods were just the start, the "tether incident" then roswell with mr corso things didnt get any better with aliens/structures on the moon & mars. I stopped watching after that.
sorry but i feel none of the content was credible.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
If the "tether" incident - SMOKING GUN NASA FOOTAGE - isn't even credible evidence to you, then what would be?
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
If the "tether" incident - SMOKING GUN NASA FOOTAGE - isn't even credible evidence to you, then what would be?
The tether footage has been explained on numerous occasions. You are looking at particles from the ruptured tether floating near the camera. A simple, prosaic and valid explanation. You are witnessing an in-camera anomolous effect, nothing more, just like the 'rods'.
It's very easy to recreate a similar effect with your own digital camera in your own home. Generate a bit of dust and take a snapshot using the flash - voila! lots of ET spaceships!! Make up a story to go with the dust photo and make your own documentary, like Escamilla and Sereda do.
Can you explain why you say the tether footage should be classed as 'credible evidence'?
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
If the "tether" incident - SMOKING GUN NASA FOOTAGE - isn't even credible evidence to you, then what would be?
The tether footage has been explained on numerous occasions. You are looking at particles from the ruptured tether floating near the camera. A simple, prosaic and valid explanation. You are witnessing an in-camera anomolous effect, nothing more, just like the 'rods'.
Originally posted by Unplugged
Thats laughable. Please explain how the "particles" are glowing, pulsating, and moving about BEHIND the tether.
Originally posted by torsion
They're not 'glowing', they're reflecting light. They're not 'pulsating', they're tumbling. They don't go behind the tether, it just appears that way because the tether is focused.
Do a search here on ATS, it's all explained in more detail. Do another search on Google, you'll find more explanations.
Instead of laughing, try taking a picture of dust with your own camera if you have one, you'll get the same 'alien spaceship' shapes because the same thing is happening.
Originally posted by Quasar
Ok, I'm curious. Show me a homemade video, or even a picture, or a link to back that up. I might try it when I get home too, and see what I come up with.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Nonsense!
For one thing, some of the "particles" clearly pass BEHIND the tether - which is 12 miles long, which means that some of those "particles" are HUGE.
Then there's the materializing and de-materializing, changing directions etc....
Originally posted by sonicology
There must be some kind of optical distortion going on because if that tether is "12 miles long" it would also have to be ~1 mile wide, and I'm fairly sure we haven't put anything that big into space!
and all of the good stuff appears to have been stolen from previous Disclosure Project or NASA Secrets videos.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
No, "we" probably haven't - but maybe someone else has!
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Not stolen; Escamilla and Greer likely worked out an agreement for Escamilla to use Greer's witness testimony and other evidence.