It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
1) My point, which I proved, was the thing many people on the board have tried to use as an arguement was false. That the FBI doesn't even have him on their most wanted list.
2) It doesn't proove he's not being wanted for 9/11.
Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
typically that means he's suspect in too many terrorist activites to list. The fact that 9/11 wasn't named does not proove that he isnt being wanted for it.
Originally posted by VicRH
is the name 'Usama' a failure of intelligence on the part of the feds or the media? Perhaps this is a MIHOP situation..
Because there is no universally accepted standard in the West for transliterating Arabic words and names into English, bin Laden's name is transliterated in many ways. The version often used by most English-language mass media is Osama bin Laden. Most American government agencies, including the FBI and CIA, use either Usama bin Laden or Usama bin Ladin, both of which are often abbreviated to UBL. Less common renderings include Ussamah Bin Ladin and Oussama Ben Laden (French-language mass media). The latter part of the name can also be found as Binladen or Binladin.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
I hear alot of people citing that the FBI no longer has Osama Bin Laden as a most wanted terrorist
Originally posted by WolfofWar
citing there wasn't enough evidence against him.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
It's often a classic rebuttle of proof of a 9/11 conspiracy
Originally posted by WolfofWar
and I just wanted to get this all out of the way. Here he is, on the most wanted list, on the top spot.
Most Wanted Terrorists
And even on the most wanted fugitives list:
Most Wanted Fugitives
Originally posted by WolfofWar
Just to bring that to everybodies attention, so we don't have to hear it presented as "evidence" anymore. Great, thanks.
Originally posted by VicRH
is the name 'Usama' a failure of intelligence on the part of the feds or the media? Perhaps this is a MIHOP situation..
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Here are NORAD drills at the same time on the same day for the exact same event as the real one:
NORAD Drills On 9/11
And here's Operation Able Danger
Able Danger
How about Put Options?
Put Options
Originally posted by WolfofWar
Just to bring that to everybodies attention, so we don't have to hear it presented as "evidence" anymore. Great, thanks.
On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”
Originally posted by VicRH
I guess he had nothing to do with it, or they can't prove that he did.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
Originally posted by Tahlen
He may be on both those most wanted lists, but take a look at what he is wanted for. Any mention of 9/11 there? Thank you for proving the point of him not being wanted for 9/11.
1) My point, which I proved, was the thing many people on the board have tried to use as an arguement was false. That the FBI doesn't even have him on their most wanted list.
2) It doesn't proove he's not being wanted for 9/11.
Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
typically that means he's suspect in too many terrorist activites to list. The fact that 9/11 wasn't named does not proove that he isnt being wanted for it.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
I have been reading this website for a while and I decided to post. So go easy on me
It seems like to me that this is a chronological issue with the FBI.
Let me explain. When Bin Laden was first put on the "Most Wanted" list it was for the Embassy Bombings. This happened BEFORE the attacks on 9/11, so the first offence is what is listed as the cause for being on the most wanted list. Simple really.
If I recall correctly another example of this would be a wanted person like Ted Bundy. He was on the most wanted list for escaping from prison, even though he had killed those girls in Florida AFTER his escape, and his dental 'bitemarks" were an exact match along with eyewitness descriptions.
He was still wanted for "escape" FIRST on the FBI most wanted list. Once he was captured he was tried for ALL the crimes he committed.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Let's not forget, folks...most of the time the simplest explanation is the best one.
Originally posted by Frith
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Let's not forget, folks...most of the time the simplest explanation is the best one.
What do you mean by that? It's not rocket science to conclude the FBI has no proof Osama Bin Laden had anything to do with the 9/11/01 attacks if they don't publish those charges against him.
Originally posted by RandomThought
I've always wondered why the FBI site calls him Usama but media and the majority of the people know him as Osama.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
First of all... anyone that says he was a CIA informant... please provide the proof. Not 25 connect the dots with speculation... PROOF!