posted on Jul, 3 2007 @ 10:06 AM
Originally posted by drblow
I think its fairly revealing that no-one has actually countered anything I have said with any solid evidence or reasoning.
OK here's a start. Why should I believe your opinion on this matter rather than make a considered judgement on the basis of a wide range of video
and photographic evidence, intelligent independent reporting and the experiences of multiple members of the public?
Having made some allowance for inconsistencies due to the confusion and near panic in Glasgow the core story of what happened is relatively clear and
consistent. You were not there, you have no particular insight into the events other than having lived in Belfast and you have offered not one shred
of hard evidence to support your theory.
Originally posted by drblowThere have been suggestions that I have made 'personal attacks' - if anyone took what I have said as
personal against them, then I'm sorry but re-read what I said.
I have and you did. For example,
If you come on this forum saying that you believe that this attack is genuine, or that the world should be more vigilant, then you are clearly
an enemy combatant, and as such you are a legitimate target.
The 'idiots' I refer to are those who post on this thread about being 'vigilant'
This is specifically a "breaking news" thread and has largely been used as such in a sensible and civil manner by most members. If you want to
discuss the failure of members to see what you believe to be the underlying truth of the story I would suggest that you start a new thread in a
different forum and argue your case there, I will happily have a constructive discussion with you on that subject. If you can convince others then
good for you, if you can't then please try not to abuse or threaten them.
[edit on 3-7-2007 by timeless test]