It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by webstra
They did a very good job then..much better then NASA did....because the original is much worse in colors.
Or is there a reason the original photo is not that good ?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
and I for one cannot come up with anything better than tape to hold fragile material at an uneven surface. It's not like they can clue it on or puncture it with anything
Originally posted by Yandros
Oh yes, lets just tape some shielding onto the command module. Thats going to be very secure as it leaves earth's atmosphere.
Surely they could have used magnetic attraction if they really needed to attach external disposable shields...
Look at the ISS, it doesn't look like it was built by high school kids on a budget of 50 dollars, but surely IT needs shielding?
And what happens when the masking tape is exposed to direct sunlight? All the glue would melt away.
Originally posted by steve-o
I still think to this day that the landing was faked , the images alone prove how fragile and homemade it seemed to appear.
Originally posted by Yandros
Oh yes, lets just tape some shielding onto the command module. Thats going to be very secure as it leaves earth's atmosphere.
*Remembers all the fuss over pealed/torn off heat shielding*
Considering this is NASA we are talking about, would it be too much to expect they ordered the parts for the module to be built with shielding?
Surely they could have used magnetic attraction if they really needed to attach external disposable shields...
Look at the ISS, it doesn't look like it was built by high school kids on a budget of 50 dollars, but surely IT needs shielding?
And what happens when the masking tape is exposed to direct sunlight? All the glue would melt away.
Originally posted by SuicideVirus
If you think ours was rickety (and you're right), you should see what the Soviets were going to try to put up there:
Originally posted by Badge01
It's somewhat surprising that the Soviets didn't have a more successful lauch rocket, called the N1, because they had a better scientist in Sergey Korolev. Somehow Von Braun managed to make the Saturn V fly more reliably, or so we're told.
Originally posted by greatlakes
called Kapton© tape
[edit on 6/30/2007 by greatlakes]
Originally posted by greatlakes
And no, the apollo program would not have designed expensive 'magnetic' means of attaching a blanket to the command module, that would be silly, when a simple 1 penny piece of tape suffices. [edit on 6/30/2007 by greatlakes]
Originally posted by Yandros
That may be the case but it remains to me an absurd notion that the craft of the space age are held together using adhesive tape.
Originally posted by Yandros
Make any list of excuses you like, its still pretty ridiculous.
Originally posted by Yandros
If you wanted to cheaply put shielding on something then why not build a lightweight frame to support it and staple it on? Like insulation is stabled onto the frame of a house. Makes more sense to have a consistent well thought out approach to micrometeorite protection. Anything would be better than material here, tape there.
Originally posted by Yandros
It also begs the question: why not have the adhesive on the material itself? So they could just stick it straight onto the craft?
Originally posted by Yandros
Well perhaps you are right. Perhaps all spacecraft are bubble wrapped with the care of a last minute birthday present before they are shipped off to perform life critical functions in hard vacuum.