GR said that he monitored these boards for some time, though we have no way of knowing the veracity of it being five plus years. Still, it is within the bounds of logic that there was some study of ATS before posting.
During that 'study period, GR could have picked up on Springers use of the word in the past. A truly devious mind, his, could then have used this word as a parting shot at those who were about to ban him.
Now I am in no way saying this is true. I feel that it is nothing more than a single word that a great many people use. I make my point only to show that there are many ways to look at such limited data.
Sometimes we are all patently absurd with our speculations.
