It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iori_komei
I did'nt mean just take some cells form person A and put them in person B,
but rather take the genetic coding that makes them immune and find a way to encode it
onto the other persons genome.
Originally posted by zeeon
This subject is pretty cut and dry. HIV is a virus. It attacks white T-Cells (You want proof go google image it) which help your body fight off infection. T-Cells go away, infection runs rampant (this is the AIDS part), and you die.
I fail to see where a conspiracy could be made about something so simple?
Originally posted by Jazzerman
3. In reply to the virusmyth.net internet link: VirusMyth answer .
Here is a good resource on how to spot fradulent websites that have little or no scientific basis behind them (referring to virusmyth of course): HIV/AIDS- How to spot fraud .
On top of that lets take a look at the actual people involved in the virusmyth.net website: Survey of virusmyth.net .
Finally, check out this site: "AIDS Myth" Rebuttals . There is a complete index of resources attached to each rebuttal and a breakdown of each of the questions that people who deny the existance of the virus put forth. If you have any questions about any of this I would be happy to answer, however, in order to save time and space with my answer I am just linking everyone to the websites I have listed instead of quoting them.
NIAID: By 12/31/94, "CDC had received reports of 42 health care workers in the United States with documented, occupationally acquired HIV infection, of whom 17 have developed AIDS in the absence of other risk factors .... These individuals all had evidence of HIV seroconversion following a discrete percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure to blood, body fluids or other clinical laboratory specimens containing HIV." [CDC, "HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 1994 year-end edition," 1995a;6(no.2).]
Originally posted by cavscout
Did you fully read the links you provided?
HIV does not infect enough T cells to cause AIDS.
HIV never infects more than 1 out of 1000 T cells; commonly just 1 out of 10,000 T cells.* People replace 5% of their T cells per day. Simple math shows that HIV cannot infect enough T cells to cause them to die off and bring down the whole immune system. Even supporters of the HIV/AIDS theory admit that this low level of T cell infection is a challenge to explain.
Originally posted by cavscout
You cant provide PROOF that there is an HIV/AIDS link.
Avert
There is no single scientific paper that proves HIV causes AIDS. Instead there are tens of thousands of papers containing a wide range of evidence that, taken together, make the case overwhelming.
Originally posted by Long Lance
i'll make it simple (link on last page)
HIV does not infect enough T cells to cause AIDS.
HIV never infects more than 1 out of 1000 T cells; commonly just 1 out of 10,000 T cells.* People replace 5% of their T cells per day. Simple math shows that HIV cannot infect enough T cells to cause them to die off and bring down the whole immune system. Even supporters of the HIV/AIDS theory admit that this low level of T cell infection is a challenge to explain.
please explain how infecting 1/1000th of the available T cells can significantly diminish their number until the immunoresponse collapses? if this claim is false, just say so, but if it's true it's pretty hard to ignore, isn't it?
Originally posted by Johnmike
Let's just...will our DNA into their cells. I'll focus, you say the magic words!
Originally posted by Jazzerman
Originally posted by cavscout
You cant provide PROOF that there is an HIV/AIDS link.
Really? Ever heard of Koch's Postulates?
Koch: HIV and AIDS link
One fact about the disease: HIV has been found in every instance of people that have an AIDS diagnosis, and AIDS has never been found in people who do not have a current HIV infection.
Originally posted by cavscout
Wait just a minute. Koch's Postulates are NOT MET. An AIDS diagnosis REQUIRES (according to the CDC) that the subject be infected with HIV.
So a subject who would otherwise be given an AIDS diagnosis based on symptoms and immunodeficiency will go undiagnosed because of the lack of HIV antibodies in the subject's system. In fact, the subject would probably be misdiagnosed with whatever ailments were actually defeating his immune system without other tests that would otherwise indicate AIDS, test that would not be ordered unless a positive test for HIV antibodies was performed.
Originally posted by cavscout
And just so we are clear, I am not saying there is no HIV/AIDS connection, I am just arguing that none has been proven. I can’t disprove it anymore than you can prove it.
Originally posted by cavscout
Wait just a minute. Koch's Postulates are NOT MET. An AIDS diagnosis REQUIRES (according to the CDC) that the subject be infected with HIV.
So a subject who would otherwise be given an AIDS diagnosis based on symptoms and immunodeficiency will go undiagnosed because of the lack of HIV antibodies in the subject's system. In fact, the subject would probably be misdiagnosed with whatever ailments were actually defeating his immune system without other tests that would otherwise indicate AIDS, test that would not be ordered unless a positive test for HIV antibodies was performed.
Absurdity to make the claim that Koch's Postulates have been met when the FIRST has not.