 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:15 AM by damajikninja
|
Carefull with double-posting, Kickout... If you think of something else to say later, try to just edit it into your last post. As a general rule, if
your post is the last one in a thread, and you can still edit it, then edit any afterthoughts into your last post.
No big deal, just helps keep the place nice and tidy! 
[edit on 6/29/2007 by damajikninja]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:16 AM by kickoutthejams
|
yes sorry about that I thought there was a post after me actually but then when I posted it up there wasn't. My bad, I do play by the book.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:18 AM by uknumpty
|
Ok, this happened in Central London, Haymarket which is about as busy as it gets even at that time in the morning (next to Leicester Square and
Piccadilly Circus.
There should be unlimited amounts of CCTV showing the incident. If none or just a few frames are shown then the conspiracy alarms will be raised.
Likewise it was a dry night so should be plenty of people out on the streets that witnessed this.
If the car was run off the road I'm surprised it didn't hit anyone on the pavement, especially near Tiger Tiger which is open til 3AM.
"Tiger Tiger presents the finest ladies night in London - for women by women featuring Lady H on the decks.
Club classics and party anthems until 3am.
£5 after 10pm. Girls go free before 11pm!!"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:19 AM by damajikninja
|
Hey, no worries buddy! Just making sure you knew the general rules and such on double posting. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:20 AM by kickoutthejams
|
cameras most liekly gone all 'cutty sark' despite the fact they seem to pick out everyone's number plate who hasn't paid the congestion charge.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:22 AM by ubermunche
|
Great! Travelling to Norfolk via Victoria coach station today, hope all the services are running normally.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:24 AM by damajikninja
|
I should point out to everyone that news of this incident was first posted to ATS by racerzeke in the thread
Massive car bomb in London? Just saw on FOX news.
Be sure to patronize his/her thread as well. Flags & Stars all around!
image source: http://images.abovetopsecret.com/flag.png
[edit on 6/29/2007 by damajikninja]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:37 AM by neformore
|
Not to blow my own trumpet but read this
A whole new world?
I must be the new Nostradamus
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:37 AM by ubermunche
|
As was pointed out, that area on a thursday night would've been pretty crowded.
Just off tangent and speculation, it was outside a gay club, gay pride march tomorrow...Soho nail bombs....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 03:39 AM by damajikninja
|
EDIT: What color was the car? Fox says it was a blue Mercedes... everyone else (and photos) reveal a silver Mercedes...
WTF?
foxnews.com...
 The station cited witnesses as saying bouncers from a nearby night club had reported that someone had crashed a blue Mercedes sedan into
garbage bins and ran away.
news.sky.com...
 The vehicle was a silver Mercedes which was also believed to have contained two propane gas canisters and a large number of nails.
image source: http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1553583.jpg
image source: http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1553586.jpg
Oops... deleted half my post. That sucks.
EDIT: Updated Scenario Maps
news.sky.com...
image source: http://atsmedia.cachefly.net/uploads/ats45805_London_Bomb_Scare.JPG
[edit on 6/29/2007 by damajikninja]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:35 AM by kindred
|
Yawn!!!!!!!!!!! cant believe any intelligent person would buy into this crap. if this is the best Al-queda can do, then be afraid be very afraid, lol
Awoke this morning to this news and the only channel really covering it was sky news. Apparently according to sky news sources the potential of this
bomb was massive, if it had been detonated. Atleast two gas cylinders were found in the back of the car along with a suspicious device.
Sky news even had Al-Queda experts on there show talking about how Al-Queda are still a threat, blah, blah, blah and the date of this attack was
symbolical of Al-Queda Blah, Blah Blah. Yawn!!!
Prime Minister Gordon brown said "Britain faces a serious and continuous threat"  C,Mon gordy if you want to scare me, your gonna have to do
better than that, lol
Yawn!!!!!! back to bed!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:38 AM by malganis
|
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
eye witness bbc news "car was being driven erratically before crashing into bins at 2am" then " driver ran away"

Haha ran away... aaaalllll the way back to Mi5!
Really though, with the stupid amount of cameras in central London, if they can't pull something out this is going to be a field day for ATS.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:39 AM by Chorlton
|
It was probably Gypos who nicked the car along with some gas bottles and were going out looking to do a bit of roofing
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:39 AM by kickoutthejams
|
I suppose this means the old 90 day detention without charge will be railroaded through now?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:42 AM by damajikninja
|
Originally posted by kickoutthejams
I suppose this means the old 90 day detention without charge will be railroaded through now? 
Kickout, can you provide any links about this for the dumb 'ole Americans? lol I wasn't aware of this piece of legislation being pushed over
there. Whats it all about, and who is supporting it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:45 AM by kickoutthejams
|
Links not sure will look but basically it's the current gov (Labour) been pushing for detention of suspects without being charged for 90 days. They
tried to push this through with the Heathrow / Liquid Gas event last summer but it failed. However there has been rumour that it was coming back for
another run.
Link ah yes here we go and it's all about Brown funny eh?
www.telegraph.co.uk.../news/2007/06/03/nterr03.xml
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:47 AM by Chorlton
|
Proposed by the control freaks a few years ago
news.bbc.co.uk...
Common sense reigned however
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:49 AM by damajikninja
|
Hmm, interesting. Kinda smells funny.
I will read up on this and also brush up on my knowledge of Brown. My gut keeps telling me that this was a propaganda psy-op of some kind.
Of course, i have an active imagination, but something about this whole incident just doesn't make much sense to me. It just doesn't feel right for
some weird reason.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:51 AM by MischeviousElf
|
Magic
The 90day rule that the government is trying to bring in as law means the police can hold "suspected" terrorists for up to 90 days without charging
them. The resaon they state they need this is to gather "forensic evidence" and build a case against the "terrorists".
It goes against all the laws of the UK... Until now if you are arrested you must be charged with an offense (therefore go on bail or remand in prison
until the case is heard in court) within 24 hours of being arrested. If the police want more time thay have apply for 24 hour periods of extra
detention each time and the judges in the UK are reticent to allow this much without a charge.
BBC 90 Days
even though the government was defeated over the proposals they are trying again to bring it in.
Kind regards
Elf
Chorltonsorry was typing asyou posted...
[edit on 29-6-2007 by MischeviousElf]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:57 AM by damajikninja
|
Wow, that would really give the policing arms of the UK government a LOT of power and freedom. They could just detain whomever they want! A great
way to discourage dissnet and rubuke of the government.
I can see why they are pushing hard for it; sounds like just the sort of thing a NWO guy would want.
I am really curious to hear the political statements made in the wake of all this today...
EDIT: I've got to go to bed, as much as I'd like to stay up and watch this develop. Keep up the good discussion here guys, and stay sharp with
updates. Flag the hell out of this thread and racezekes thread so that the ATS
community will follow this story.
Cheers!
[edit on 6/29/2007 by damajikninja]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |