Originally posted by CaptainObvious
The dogs were PART of why his theory didn't hold water with me. I actually raised points on a few things.
Still not sure where you get that I am derailing. Derailing is changing the topic...taking it in another direction. All of my posts dealt with the
possibilities of explosives being secretly smuggled into the WTC.
If pointing out facts about a topic/thread is derailing.. then... guilty as charged.
The dogs don't matter. They are controlled by humans and their responses or lack thereof need to be interpreted by humans.
You cannot show that whatever dog was on duty at that time was trained to smell even a FRACTION of the munitions available to the US government or
foreign intelligence apparatuses. It may have been someones pet for all you know...
You cannot show that the handler or the dog ever went searching through the building and unless you are a bomb dog trainer or have EVIDENCE to show
that:
1. Bomb dogs were present that day and on all previous days,
2. They were actively moving throughout the buildings. Not just standing in the lobby.
3. They were trained or could pick up on whatever explosive/incindary that could be employed.
4. The dogs was even trained.
5. the handler was legit.
etc. etc. etc.
You do not have this evidence and are just posting "things" to throw up road blocks.
I am CERTAIN that if this was an inside job finding a way around the dog would take about 10 seconds for the planners.
1. Use something they are not trained to smell.
2. Mask/seal the smell.
3. Send in a plant/fake team of handler /dog.
4. etc.
People get LARGE DRUG SHIPMENTS right past drug dogs ALL OF THE TIME... I can even tell you how so your little dog theory is nothing more than a
distraction.
The topic IS NOT about smuggling the explosives in... it is about squibs and placement.
YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT ABOUT SMUGGLING THEM IN... that is CLASSIC DERAILMENT.
[edit on 10-7-2007 by Pootie]
