It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by observe50
Safely lands on the Moon July 20th at 2017 GMT ---0417 p.m. EDT
Neil steps on Moon at 0256 GMT ---10:56:15 p.m. EDT
Originally posted by observe50
I hope others join in, I would like to get a few more opinions on this. What you are saying sounds logical, but I'm not fully convinced.
Originally posted by Badge01
Wasn't there a needed slingshot orbit around Earth needed to boost the speed? Maybe they included that in the itinerary?
Originally posted by nescafe8572
I have to say that I don`t believe they went there in the first place.
Why.
NASA are currently developing the next trip to the moon and will take around 20yrs to put everything needed in place.
Why?
Can`t they just redevelop the original tech with obvious 21 centurary technology
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Their velocity was greater on the return trip due to decreased spacecraft mass, and greater trans Earth injection V due to lower gravity of the moon?
Originally posted by budski
Just a thought, but why would decreased mass matter in space?
Or am I being thick?
Originally posted by nescafe8572
I have to say that I don`t believe they went there in the first place.
Why.
NASA are currently developing the next trip to the moon and will take around 20yrs to put everything needed in place.
Why?
Can`t they just redevelop the original tech with obvious 21 centurary technology