It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Iran thinks it can tell the outside world to get lost whilst it arms the Taleban, Iraqi militias and Hezbollah.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Iran thinks it can create ballistic missile projects, enrich uranium for an atomic bomb project and that all this has no consequences.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Of course it does have consequences. The same outside world which Iran is threatening is the same outside world which now imposes trade sanctions.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
It shows how out of touch the Iranian Revolutionary guard and the Mullahs are with the real world. Now the ordinary people of Iran are facing the consequences and are mightily pissed off.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Um...how about Israel for one? You been under a rock?
Originally posted by bodrul
they have vast amounts of that stuff so why not exploit it?
the US and other countries want to make a bank for enriched uranium
if Iran can get in not only can it supply its needs but those of others.
Originally posted by bodrul
who is Iran threatening?
please tell me who Iran threatend?
The dichotomy described above can be attributed at least in part to the large development costs associated with nuclear power plants, compared to their fossil fuel alternatives. For example, the capacity cost for a current-generation nuclear plant is between $1400 and $2000/kilowatt(1), while a natural gas combined cycle plant can be built for approximately $600/kW of capacity(2). That means that a 2,000 MW nuclear complex would cost between $2.8 and $4 billion, even though the same electricity could be produced by a gas turbine plant costing around $1.2 billion. In a country with limited capital for investment, this difference translates into less generating capacity being built over time.
last time i checked the US were the talebans best friends even created the alqida
Originally posted by bodrul
....and last time i checked the US were the talebans best friends even created the alqida
Originally posted by Seekerof
Simply and solely the United States again, bodrul?
Add:
England (MI5, MI6)
Pakistan (ISI)
Saudi Arabia
Bin Laden
Usama Bin Laden was as a Pakistani spy working indirectly in Afghanistan with Mujahadeen against the Soviet occupation. Is that what you refer to Bodrul ?
Originally posted by defcon5
Funny I never see them wanting funding or help building geothermal, wind, or solar power generation facilities, isn’t it?
Originally posted by defcon5
I do hope your joking, as the other poster said, you been living under a rock for the last 5 years?
Their president has flat out stated that he wants to see Israel “Wiped off the map”…
saying to wipe out the zionest regieme of israel is completly diffrent then saying wiping israel of the map.
so come on quote the leader say Israel and not Zionest
please feel free to prove this?
i have seen many documentries on the taliban and how they were created
United states did play a large role. they paid the taliban as a proxy to fight the soviets, they didnt keep an eye on their money and who it went to.
you seem to think because of the costs they should use Gas reserves when that and their oil wont last forever and with nuclear power they can prelong that.
why should they have to use their gas supplies when they can extend that to sell to others?
also please show where it says their nuclear reactors will last only 7 years
www.globalsecurity.org...
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Finish the sentence Bodrul... The Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem does = Isreal.
Can you tell us of any other Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem ?
You're being selective as usual, making a virtue out of ignorance.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Gosh Bodrul you couldn't have read very much about Osama B/L. Either that or you were very selective and only read Jihadist literature ?
Don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself publicly ?
Read this:
www.globalresearch.ca...
usinfo.state.gov...
Actually they didn't fund the Taleban. They funded the Pakistani ISI to fund the Mujahadeen to fight the Soviets. Do you just make this up as you go Bodrul or do you spend all your spare time on Jihadist websites ?
Forget what rock... What planet are you on... Hello, earth calling planet Bodrul ?
But Bodrul... don't let facts get in the way of your delusions. Iran does not sell off it's natural gas. It might be a different argument if they did. Nobody's forcing them to forgo income from exporting natural gas if they don't export it ?
Iran's gas reserves of 940 trillion cubic feet (or 1,006,800,000,000,000,000 BTUs of energy) will last another 50 years. This compares with just 8,700,000,000,000,000 BTUs from nuclear reserves. Iran's Natural gas reserves are 126 times greater than energy available from nuclear reserves. Iran's gas is mainly just flared off... Wasted.
Their Uranium reserves if they build the seven 1000Mw power stations talked of will last only 9 months per reactor. It's quite easy to do the maths Bodrul. Go figure at U235 reserves at 0.7% of 5,000 tonnes surveyed by the Beijing Institute of Uranium Geology.
That means 35 tonnes un-enriched U235.
One thing which is accurately known are Iran’s Uranium reserves in Yzad province. In 1985 the Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology conducted a survey of Iran’s uranium reserves which are only about 5,000 tonnes. Go read the journal “Ettel’at” for 12 January 1985. Also records of US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, testimony of Gary Milhollin 6 May 1997.
Read page 30 of the PDF file attached below Bodrul...
Actually it says that one reactor will have just enough uranium for 6.5 years or the seven reactors which they plan will each have just 9 months worth of fuel. What a waste of money.
The reactor will last for decades as white elephants, but they wont have any uranium to power them. What they will do is produce enough Plutonium for dozens of nuclear weapons.
www.globalsecurity.org...
Originally posted by princeofpeace
a country who is swimming in oil would rather spend all this money on weapons.... Piss poor leadership.