Originally posted by seanc
That's called a bug. The frame rate cannot keep up with the motion of the insect so it appears to be one large creature when it is actually the
result of a slow frame rate. Try it at 60 fps and you'll see the difference.
You are quite right...it has to do with motion blurr caused by the fact that a video camera can't resolve the insect (usually a moth) in a single
frame, so the result is something like a long-exposure image...the long membrane wing being the the blurred image of the moth's wing beating up and
down (while moving forward), and the rod being the moth's body. In fact people have shown that by videotaping moths, they can get
EXACTLY the same result as purported videotape of rods...like the video in the OP.
There were some people somewhere who set up a night-vision camera and some nets. The camera picked up the rods, and the things getting caught in the
nets. When they checked to see waht was caught, they found only moths.
Now, some people will say
"just because you can make a moth on a video look just like a flying rod doesn't mean rods don't exist". That
may be true, but since most the evidence that rod believers have are these various videos, I'd say it's a pretty good chance that Flying rods don't
exist. EDIT: Until I see more and different evidence, I won't believe in their existence.
[edit on 27-6-2007 by Soylent Green Is People]