It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 11 11
I'm going to put you on ingnore too, because you don't seem to be helping anybody...
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
Originally posted by 11 11
I'm going to put you on ingnore too, because you don't seem to be helping anybody...
you won't hear me anymore, but ... wtg putting everyone disagreeing on ignore
Originally posted by 11 11
The "drone" has 5 arms sticking out. 1 large, and 4 smaller ones. On all but 1 of those images, 4 of those arms are at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions, and the 5th arm is at the 2 o'clock position.
The arm that is at the 2 o'clock position on all the other photos, is actually in the 10 o'clock position on the image above..
Either the image was mirrored or the CGI drone was mirrored. Either way, the photo is not consistent with the others...
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Im still on the fence on this issue. With that being said, 11 11 did you ever think that maybe those arms could rotate around?
Originally posted by 11 11I knew someone would say this... I'm not putting "everyone disagreeing" on ignore.. iM PUTTING EVERYONE THAT HAS CONTRIBUTED ABSOLUTLY NOTHING BUT RANT, on ignore...
[snip]
Someone explain the mirrored chad images please??
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
rotating arms? on www.coasttocoastam.com... you see on the last image the sky through the ring, maybe arms can rotate, except for the big one?
Originally posted by 11 11
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Im still on the fence on this issue. With that being said, 11 11 did you ever think that maybe those arms could rotate around?
Oh yes thank you for this out of the blue totaly not even relavant or accurate wild guess. Try again? The "witness" didn't say anything about rotating arms.
Anyway.... Let me try this wild guessing thing you people do..., it looks so easy!
Hey 11 11, did you ever think that maybe those arms are just holograms!!?!?
Hey 11 11 did you ever think that maybe those arms are detachable, and they attach together with velcro!?
Hey 11 11 did you ever think those arms are just super top secret alien techonology not found on this Earth, and that those arms actaully don't exist and its only a manipulation of light that makes it look like arms are there??!?
man I can go on forever.
Originally posted by 11 11
man I can go on forever.
Originally posted by 11 11The believers think I am attacking their beliefs, and they take it personal, then it gets ugly from there...
I will never understand how some of you people are so pationate about something that has so much evidence against it.
I think that its legit, Either Alien or from us but reversed engineered from Alien tech.
Originally posted by Fiverz
Seems there is ALOT of debating in this thread started by people that are dead-set on it being one thing or another. That's fine ... but the motto here is "deny ignorance". By shutting yourself off to alternate possibilities (and that's just what they are ... possibilities, NOT statements of fact) you are being ignorant in the greatest way possible.
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
- why would anyone putting that much effort into such a nice and entertaining hoax fail to correct such grave errors and mistakes as you claim?
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
- what could be the reason for putting such a hoax together, a hoax that only reaches a negligible part of the population, eg. fringe sites?
Originally posted by Bunch
11 11 as much as I love your passion on this issue,when you ignore people that dont agree with your point of view is easy to see what you want to see or hear.
Originally posted by 11 11
So according to your logic, LIFE is BUNK, because it has multiple explinations? Get real. Anyone and anybody, true or false, could make alternate explinations, no matter how stupid they are. Thats pretty much what you do... These two quotes above equal this: blah blah blah blah distraction distraction derail derail.
Originally posted by 11 11
I am a professional graphic artist, I thought I was clear about that? I even showed some of my work, I will even show you my tutorials I write for 3DSM.... answer this.... do you know what a highlight is? I don't think you do.
Originally posted by 11 11
I don't think you understand what anything means. Seriously, its this damn simple.... The camera used to take the "Chad" photos, is capable of uploading images RAW and JPG straight from the camera without going through image programs. Thats all we want. We want the original picture from the camera. We don't want it resized, we don't want the color edited, we just want it straight from the camera. Untill then, this is a proven fake by EXIF.
Originally posted by 11 11
0 FOV?!?!?! I said absolutly nothing about "feild of view". I said "depth of field". Do you know the difference??
en.wikipedia.org...
Fake halo lights....are you telling me you didn't see the "big basin" pictures? They show both impossible depth of field, and fake halo lights.
Just look at this image.
Notice the flowers in front are blurry and the moutain way far back is clear? Yet at the same time the drone is clear? This is impossible depth of field. Now look at the white halo around the drone. Where is this light coming from? Not the Sun. And please dont say "its the alien anitgravity waves making that light", because thats just childish.
Originally posted by 11 11
I'm sorry that you didn't do your research and that you have no clue what you are talking about...
Originally posted by 11 11
What shadows? I didn't make any shadows..... WTF are you talking about?
Originally posted by 11 11
Now you are talking crap again. "Compressed to medium size in-camera"????? The picture whos EXIF data I checked was a 1600x1200 image, which is the max size the camera can capture. It was NOT resized. The reason you forget to mention why we dont have RAW's is because this enitre thing is a CGI hoax, and giving away the RAW's is fatal to this hoax.
Originally posted by 11 11
If he isn't a photo enthusiast, then why did he load an ICC Profile on the image, AND used Adobe Album 3.0?? The camera used to take the photos, once plugged into a Windows OS will pop up a folder will all the unaltered images in it. He could easly copy and paste that, and we will have a RAW image. Its so simple. There is no reason for this Chad guy to load it in Adobe Image.... When I saw RAW image, I do not mean the actual "RAW FORMAT", I am talking about a RAW JPG file straight from the camera.
Originally posted by 11 11
No its not "assumption" its called subconsious communication. The creator of all the images accidently left subconsious information that only few can see.... All the pictures say something.. they do... you just have to listen to them. Not assumption, all facts.