[HOAX] Isaac CARET - Drones [HOAX], page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 185 times


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 01:41 AM by ExquisitExamplE
Originally posted by j_kalin
I vote hoax. Anyone who worked on this project for as long as Isaac claims would have a lot of technical knowledge, If he really wanted to disclose this technology, he would have relayed some technical data, ie equations, etc that explain the principles behind "antigravity." Instead, he rambles on for pages and pages about his motives, his employment history, etc, but never providing any useful information. It's just someone's idea of fiction. Nice pics of who-knows-what.


How can you know if they even had equations. He said himself that not only did they really have no idea where to begin with these "artifacts", The military brass wouldn't supply them with all the data they needed to make good progress.

And it seems to me that he did provide "equations" in the form of the linguistic primer. If these symbols were the medium with which they were working, would it not make sense to describe their application in the same context?

As for the CGI pics posted wildone, which he claims all look "completely real", Not even! The only ones that looked "real" to me were the 1st and 7enth, and thats from someone whos knowledge of CGI is limited to playing a lot of computer games

I would imagine that if I really knew what to look for, I would be able to identify them all as CGI rather quickly.

As for the pics of the antigravity generator and I-beams, I would have to say (again with little formal CGI knowledge), they look to be real objects to me, the curvature of light and reflection on the I-beams seems very precise and realistic to me.

[edit on 27-6-2007 by ExquisitExamplE]


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 01:47 AM by neformore
One of the advanatages of the transformers cartoons was that it never really explained how they transformed - they just "did" it.

Now if I was a science fiction writer trying to put a cutting edge on to a story I think thousands of small parts held together by antigravity and bonded by a complex "living" language/machine code might be a good way of doing it.

The problem comes when trying to derive abstract visualisations of such a thing and then it starts to fall down.

Looking at the images - there is a "shadow" around their base that is not truly representative of the lighting on the model. Also - on one of the "photos" theres been a slight bit of sloppyness on the angle of the plane the model is based on and the piece on the right hand side looks "odd" when compared to the positioning of the other two. The lightsourcing appears to be inconsistent as well, with reflections not matching up quite as they should.

Looking at the language I was instantly reminded of graphics used in Klingon, Romulan and Borg from Star- Trek - and this is what I referred to as far as abstract visualisation. I'm not sure who is doing the graphics for the Transformers film but I'd put money on it that they work in a production house that did the on screen effects on the later series of Voyager or one of the later films.

As for the detailed production of documents, actors have to have props, and things they refer to for on screen visual cues, so a few pages of blurb/technobabble could be commonplace (ask the Okuda's who worked on Star Trek about technobabble)

I'm calling this one another part of the viral.


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 02:22 AM by promomag
Take a look at this image:



farm2.static.flickr.com...

Now as interesting as this persons story is, this image really tells me a LOT about this person.

1: This is real

or

2: This IS THE person that created the drone and initially submitted all the original photos under the various names to various sites on the Internet.


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 02:33 AM by promomag
Taking a look at the 3rd photo, some one mentioned seeing lint? I wanted others to take a look at this and discuss how artifacts like these in the photos help out the CGI train of thinking.



Original FULL SIZE here:

isaaccaret.fortunecity.com...

So, this guy might have created it in whatever software application, printed it out, then took a color photocopy of it, and then scanned it back in to the computer to publish online.... is my thinking out of line so far on this?

thoughts?


reply posted on 27-6-2007 @ 02:34 AM by -Jaguar-
This is supposdely a Halo 3 viral marketing site. Scroll to the bottom. Look familure?

Also I notice this Fortunecity site still has not gone down. The free fortunecity sites are limited to 3GB of bandwidth. If the site doesn't go down, someone paid for hosting, which would be extremely easy to trace.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 19 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.