It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
In any case it appears it's a bad time to be hoaxing UFO/Alien stuff on the internet unless you don't mind having some very serious people looking for you.
[edit on 7-1-2007 by Springer]
Originally posted by blowfishdl
Also, if it was classified data, why is there so much that is blacked out? That only happens to de-classified data.
Originally posted by blowfishdl
Just a couple of things to take into consideration..
(I was warned for my comment before against C2C possibly creating this themselves so it might happen again now..)
Originally posted by blowfishdl
1. 1,000,000 page views a month can be worth over $10,000 a month with the right amount of advertisers, and big business. Also, it doesn't say if the hits are unique hits or just plain hits. Unique hits (obviously) are worth much much more. Let me state right here though, they are doing a poor job of advertising and are not pulling anywhere near $2,000 for the site alone.
Originally posted by blowfishdl
2. It not only promotes their 1,000,000 hit website, but it also promotes their $1,000,000 radio show. I personally, had never heard of C2C until now, and its a name that all of ATS readers now know.
Originally posted by Springer
By the way, how many "hits" do you think ATS gets a month?
Springer...
[edit on 7-1-2007 by Springer]
Originally posted by blowfishdl...Also, if it was classified data, why is there so much that is blacked out? That only happens to de-classified data.
Originally posted by blowfishdl
ATS must get a good 10,000,000 if your not talking about unique hits. I can't even imagine with all the refresh's, new posts, breaking news, and HOW many registered forum users?
Originally posted by ejsaunders
It makes it appear as if there is something that is of national importance or of commercial interest, but looking objectively at the surrounding material, there would have to have been a BIG difference in the language for it to have any real importance.
Originally posted by Springer
Chunder,
You need to do lots of research on how unfriendly intelligence agencies use the internet. Heck, even "friendly" intel agencies.
I'm glad you decided against trying to hoax ATS, it really is useless.
Springer...
Originally posted by chunder
Secondly, do you really think it would be that easy to shut down this story on major web sites. You think the "powers that be" would take the chance of raising that red flag with the likes of Whitley Streiber and LMH.
Originally posted by chunder
...Firstly, the link between UFO/ alien hoaxes and terrorism is ridiculous. If your insider friends are feeding you that you are being played big time. If it is seriously believed then the world has some even bigger problems than realised and this should be run as a major story on somewhere like ATS...
Originally posted by schuyler
The problem here is that neither of these fine people is a very credible journalist in the greater scheme of things. Defend them if you feel compelled, but it doesn't matter. NYT and Newsweek are not going to come calling to them or take much interest in what they say. The 'goverment' or 'intel' or 'MIB' or whatever is not risking a thing by having either of these people take an interest. After all, LMH just declared a known CGI video as a fine example of reality; and Whitley has repeatedly been kidnapped by aliens. I know the ATS crowd tends to take these sorts of things more seriously, but the point is that the rest of the world doesn't.