Originally posted by pinchofsalt
been following the drone reports on the likes of moulton howes website and coast to coast etc and was wondering whether someone here would be good
enough to give me a quick summary of why of the current situation (how and why they are a hoax). The last time I read this thread it only had a few
pages, and the drone reports were in their infancy.
Anyone care to sum up the current situation in a paragraph or two? (it would take me a month to read through the 410 pages plus ext links)
Also, As Strieber has gone on record saying hes seen one, Moulton howe was still on about them in December, do you believe this weakens their position
as serious UFO researchers.
Assuming that is that its all been proved a hoax??
Hi pinch if you go to dronehoax.com there is a good summary there. If you click on my profile you will see some of the work done by analysts and
exhibits etc that pointed to a hoax a long time ago.
Lots of work in the photographic analysts summary no discussion thread, was posted at OMF.
If you went to ufowatchdog.com your question is answered just on previous hoaxes alone. No, they are not imo, serious researchers. They are
supporter and guest of Whitley, had given him her own photo analysis, showing photos fake., but he
ignored her, and the rest of us.
Whitley just remarked at Unknown country, that he may, after all, have been "dreaming" concerning that last sighting, claiming they were real, but
it was a "Doozey" he stated.
whitleys journals mystery of the drones scroll down posted Dec 27.
Linda early on, claimed a fake video was real.
The Drone Research team, dedicated exclusively, with financing, and marketing, to proving they are real, just admitted, what we knew for 2 years,
based on analysis, that deception was clearly involved in the flickr photo case of Rajman1977. But they refuse to show where the pole actually was.
]The new investigation is at a stage where I can report that the Raj location is not adjacent to or near Capitola and deception was clearly at
work in Raj's report.
If Linda, currently in withdrawal, who holds "hard" evidence in the form of 11 hi res TY photos, records of conversations with the
hoaxter/witnesses, including Isaac, 12 conversations with Chad, (another exposed liar) and has produced nothing to date. Well, that demonstrates she
and Whitley, have nothing, and we don't expect them to say anything, The illusion of serious journalism given by them, in this case, is just that,
Anything they release now, i.m.o, would expose the same incompetence and gullibility, and perhaps even complicity, In perpetuating this hoax as a
real event, knowing full well it was the the contrary. Incompetency, yes, and and lets keep it real here, dishonesty.
As for others saying this thread, being a "sorry" and "convoluted" thread, or even me personally, It is the ONLY thread ANYWHERE that has
seriously looked for the Hoaxers. It is first and the ONLY Thread ANYWHERE that declared it hoax First based on sound research, not my convoluted
And that was backed up by the full faith and credit of ATS Administration .
My style may not be to everyone's liking, but its the facts that count, and its a collective effort here of many good people, much much smarter than
me for sure, particularly those in the ARC, which is a cross section of members ATS,OM,UCB,UfoBlog, Alien.DE, that resulted in helping ferret them
One forum, One thread, 8000 posts convoluted? Its nothing compared to others with 350 threads 27,000 posts, and over a thousand pages , if you look
around. I would say we were rather efficient, in getting to our conclusion, and looking for the hoaxters, if nothing else.
We are not finished yet .
Good day to all
and to all a good day.
[edit on 23-1-2009 by Sys_Config]