It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by solarwind
The comparison with the crop circle only serves to underscore the differences in my mind. Examine the symbols carefully and the complexity that is revealed is astonishing. There are few simple lines and circles in Isaac's symbols whereas the crop circle is nothing but simple lines and circles.
Originally posted by keeb333
It occured to me that (assuming, of course, that this is not a hoax) some of the unexplained crop circles out there might correlate with elements of thier technology.
Originally posted by Sophismata
Psychics aren't real. Crop circles are all man-made. If you believe otherwise, prove it.
Originally posted by keeb333
Anyone else notice a rough similarity between the 3 "semiphore" sections in the the drawing from the language primer and elements from some crop circles. It occured to me that (assuming, of course, that this is not a hoax) some of the unexplained crop circles out there might correlate with elements of thier technology.
For example:
Does anyone know if the above crop circle was admitted to have been manmade? If not, there may be some relation to the ET tech.
Food for thought, anyway.
Originally posted by solarwind
Regardless of its authenticity, you have to give the author extremely high marks for the inventiveness of the anti-grav tech and the design language, e.g. "But upon [much] closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big holographic computational substrate - each "computational element" (essentially individual particles) can function independently, but are designed to function together in tremendously large clusters."
I don't really know what this means but it sure as hell does sound cool!
Originally posted by greatlakes
Do we have any FONT experts on this board, what font is used in the document that Isaac has posted. Particularly the font in the figures and text seem to be unique, and not familiar with it. Maybe its common, but maybe its an outdated one as well. This doc is supposed to be from the 80's, so if any discrepancies are found with it ....well you know...
Originally posted by srsen
But IF a crop-circle link can be further substantiated then it will go a long way to proving this to be the real deal.
Originally posted by solarwind
They are absolutely beautiful and captivating in the denseness of the detail. Whoever created these designs had a certain creative genius and waaayyyy to much time on their hands. I've never seen anything quite like them and to create them solely for purposes of an obscure internet hoax is, well, stunning.
Originally posted by stealthyone
My best guess would be Book Antiqua font - see comparison below:
Top is from Word, Book Antiqua Font, Size 23
Bottom is excerpt from photograph of the report
Originally posted by greatlakes
Originally posted by stealthyone
My best guess would be Book Antiqua font - see comparison below:
Top is from Word, Book Antiqua Font, Size 23
Bottom is excerpt from photograph of the report
Definitely looks close, same type of font (family?), but not exact. My point is if this is a hoax, the person must have used a certain font in typing out the document, this font has to be able to be found, unless its obsolete, outdated, which would lend on the side of NOT HOAX. Of course a really thorough hoaxer would create modifications to existing fonts, which is in itself alot of work. You basically have to create each letter and symbols to match...
Good work BTW, I'm terrible with fonts and such Let us know if you're continuing the search and find anything.
[edit on 6/26/2007 by greatlakes]