posted on Jul, 1 2008 @ 11:25 PM
Hi fort you are correct we must balance past experience and still keep an open mind.
We know we will always find sightings on mufon and nuforc and other agencies. The quality of the sightings are usually not the best. so we make extra
allowances to query further. In this case , the first pic was 85 folled by 14 and 15. Meaning there were 28 shots in between what he captuured d on
film He stays basically in the same small area where the tree is. No other shots of the object are shown. We dont know if he left and came back or
what . The impression based on his words were he was shooting from that same spot as the tree is always there. The clouds , and very heavy clouds at
that, suddenly are gone, . He ststes burst for 2 pics. at first! that would be like 85 and then an 86. but no we have an 85 and a huge leap to the
last two, which would appear to be the ones shot in succession..the last two not 85 and another. So we have to wonder, what really happened between
85 and 114. Why the confusion. Why the missing clouds, and were the clouds moving so fast he was able to catch the best shot first, not last as he
says. Unless the film decreased, in number display, so that 115 was first, 114, second and then 85.
That would not account for the clouds disappearing so fast, while an allegedly flying or moving much faster object suddenly captured, near the same
spot.nor why he would on the first two NOT be aiming where the dogs were barking, ie more towards the groundlevel.
However.again its not that we say fake..we just want to look at the background or scenery, and whether the actions ae consistent with what is being
reported. Its the very first step, the at first glance.
More questions would of course have to be asked and resolved.
We expected anticipated something like drones way back, but this is nothing like that, but now rings are treated as such by LMH so that would in
essence include a greater class of sightings whether round, spherical, or whatever. It lends a faux "legitimacy" to the old drones, and volume
:there is strength in numbers, and volume often hides sin. Even whenthough they are totally different. So, With thousands of all kinds of uavs,
military and civilian, even RC.s I would not exclude that possibility. But then I would certainly NOT match what we know to be hoax with anything
appearing later, because its round and flys fast, something even the old drones did not do..they were slower, and better manners as they would stop
and pose to let you take a picture, and then wink and vanish..poof!
So, we do this , Case by case..as we took chad raj steh and TY until we saw the sneaky patterns, flaws, and yes, still ongoing scheme. This after all
right now, the equivalent of the Christmas seaon for UFos and the Business surrounding them.
Thats my opinion., the last statement a fact.
[edit on 2-7-2008 by Sys_Config]