It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spf33
part of the fascination with drones is because of this very fact. ask fence, i gave him the link to all my work after the steven photos went up, a year ago, in a paranoia that someone knew who i was, found my work and was poking fun at me. i still feel that for other reasons currently...
and i was worried that if anyone were to see my old work they would instantly do what is happening here right this moment.
Originally posted by Double_Nought_Spy
reply to post by tomiuk
Here is an interesting document that has been around for a while:
www.apa.org...
Two warnings-- it's a PDF and it is written by experts.
Originally posted by tomiuk
No, I'm not a modeling expert or cgi expert, but I've got a good brain
and a good eye for things. (ok lev's pic was an exception, but still worthy of seeking a definitive answer to..)
Another plus on my side is realistic logic, something that seems to have escaped from this thread..
Originally posted by TheShadow
reply to post by tomiuk
Yes you have joined an elite group of paranoid delusional people that believes every picture they have ever seen is authentic...
Originally posted by tomiuk
No, I'm not a modeling expert or cgi expert, but I've got a good brain and a good eye for things. (ok lev's pic was an exception, but still worthy of seeking a definitive answer to..) Another plus on my side is realistic logic, something that seems to have escaped from this thread..
Originally posted by s_q_t
Originally posted by TheShadow
reply to post by tomiuk
Yes you have joined an elite group of paranoid delusional people that believes every picture they have ever seen is authentic...
Shads, haven't you learned the secret yet? Only the pictures with character are authentic. That's the critical test.
Originally posted by spf33
now that omf user hpo has generously lent his very nice drone model to the investigation i plan to re-examine that study.
About the shared vanishing point,..I think you are right, that is very odd, strange that I didn't notice that before, one of my hobby's is to photograph planes and I think I couldn't position myself the way Rajman did.
All vanishing points and crossing points of the poles and cables are exactly the same in both photo's, that can not be.
Originally posted by Siddharta
But still I want to repeat my question: Did you buy that hacker story of Rajman's account shortly after you updated it?
Did you never have doubts in the stories, we were told? Or did you just look at pictures?
Originally posted by spf33
doesn't make any sense why a hoaxer would have even put the images with exif up to begin with knowing that someone could gift the high res.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
To further drop this ship to the bottom of the ocean, I have pointed out more lighting inconsistencies in these images with this post:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So, tomiuk, please leave the debate for the experts.
[edit on 11-6-2008 by ALLis0NE]
Originally posted by spf33
would be nice to get flickr's take on it, but i don't see that ever happening.
Originally posted by tomiuk
If you think that you can convince anyone of lighting inconsistencies when the drones in the original photographs are at different angles to the sun.. then you have some gullible believers here.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
SPF33 which of the witnesses dont you believe just for the record and why not.
Originally posted by Siddharta
Should not be so much of a problem, if they keep records more than twelve months.
The story happened on th 4th of June. I didn't note the address, but you surely can give me that URL. I will try to find out.