It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Double_Nought_Spy
The burden of proof is still on the claimants, no matter how much whining or disappearing they do. No one here, or anywhere else, is required to prove the Earth is not hollow, either.
Originally posted by nfotech
So let me get this straight, a web server which logs the IP's of people who visit is some kind of illegal top secret hacking technology?
Someone needs to get a clue.....
Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by Sys_Config
Hi Sys, I know what you are saying, but what if there was also a very dangerous flu going round, life threatening even.
Had exactly the same symptoms but the treatment was completely different.
Maybe even the doctor's, whilst experts in their own right, weren't aware at the time of this other type of flu, after all it's not from round there.
However you were aware of it, having had a distant relative die of this flu in 1947.
Whose opinion do you take - the first, third, tenth - or do you want a full set of tests to get conclusive proof one way or the other before accepting an opinion.
Conclusive proof either way may not be possible but isn't that the goal here.
Sorry to rehash a previous discussion, just have an issue with any expert who offers an opinion but is not prepared to back it up. Maybe if they did look closer there could be a percentage error rather than a conclusive opinion. Either way it could only help - I've seen detailed reports on pictures of chewing gum on windows, a year later and no-one willing to stake their reputation on a quotable opinion, let alone a detailed report ?
Originally posted by Siddharta
Looking at the "big picture" there is not one ounce of sense, just the glowing eyes of some childish people, who think they found paradise.
Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by davidbiedny
Thanks for a direct clarification of your opinion, I for one really appreciate it, and I am not being sarcastic.
If you do have the time I have one question.
Is there anything in any of the images related to this affair that either
a) categorically indicates manipulation,
b) is highly suspicious of a particular form of manipulation,
or is it that,
c) taken in context with the rest of the information known about them they are highly suspicious ?
Re: A direct comparison, Chad image - CG
« Reply #35 Today at 8:44pm » --------------------------------
Jun 3, 2008, 11:13pm, JakeReason wrote:Well numbers, I could certainly create, plan, orchestrate and manage all that. As an entrepreneur I've created products from imagination to reality and propagated them to a national conscience level. Each of these was immensely more complex then the drone saga.
However, I agree it would be an effort. I would say it would take me about 3 weeks with a team of 5. And there's 10's of 1000's of me's out there.
The big question of course would be WHY?[/iquote]
Not lacking in bad manners or worthless diatribe Numbers goes on to say.
I think too many people are trying to diminish the complexity level of this thing. It's very easy for some blow hard to log on and post how they could have done it with a 286 and fifty bucks. Wasn't it David Biedney who said it would cost $5000 just to have a professional look at the pics? That starts to put things into perspective.
enlightenedseeker
Long term Peer-Group Member
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 366
Karma: -1 Re: A direct comparison, Chad image - CG
« Reply #36 Today at 9:14pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think the same few people are diminishing the importance of any work carried here by professionals such as Kris and unbelievably suggest reproducibility would be so prohibitive as to preclude hoax. And the man already said what it would take to to do this. a handful, a few weeks, and done. As for the David Biedny crack, I believe it was posted somewhere what it would cost to analyze the photos and whether that was followed who knows. Perhaps all the experts are morons now. Correct. Thats what it sounds like .So I dont see what that had to do with Kris presentation It does its job, thank you Kris another job well done.
« Last Edit: Today at 9:15pm by enlightenedseeker
I am glad to see not everyone is a total imbecile. Thank you ES and JakeReason
This is why the contention of produce a report by these screaming meemees is shortsighted, and is an excercise in futility given their historical intransigence.
[edit on 5-6-2008 by Sys_Config]
[edit on 5-6-2008 by Sys_Config]
[edit on 5-6-2008 by Sys_Config]