[HOAX] Isaac CARET - Drones [HOAX], page 30

I agree with SuicideVirus that the blacked out portions of the documents probably describe elements of the "very specific type of field" only briefly mentioned by "Isaac" in his introductory letter. I also agree that there is a level of deception going on in the way Isaac has presented his evidence. Though I tend to believe that this is not a hoax in the general sense of the word, I also do not believe Isaac is forthcoming as to why certain sections of the documents are blackened out. Linda Moulton Howe wrote that "Isaac" blackened out those sections. Whether he is the one to do so or not seems unclear from "Isaac"'s own statements (Earthfiles.com "Part 1: Explanation of the Recent "Strange Craft" Sightings"):

"However my intent is not to deceive, so information that I think is too risky to share will be simply left out rather than obfuscated in some way (aside from my alias, which I freely admit is not my real name). I would estimate that with the information contained in this letter, I could be narrowed down to one of maybe 30-50 people at best, so I feel reasonably secure." - "Isaac"

Perhaps Linda Moulton Howe incorrectly assumed "Isaac" was the one to blacken out parts of the documents. But certainly those blackened out parts wouldn't identify "Isaac." If "Isaac" wanted to prevent controversy as to why parts of the documents had been blacked out, he could have informed us that those documents had been blackened out before he got them. I suspect "Isaac" knows more about why those documents have been blackened out than he is telling us. I believe that "Isaac" was burned out from working on CARET, and I believe that the artifacts are indeed real. What "Isaac" is not fully telling us is why he was burned out. I suspect that those working on CARET slowly and gradually came to realize through time working on the project that there was more going on with the artififacts than met the eyes. What I mean by this is that there is an invisible and perhaps "telepathic" aspect to their operations. After spending years trying to decipher how the artifacts worked, the group became disillusioned that there was an invisible aspect, i.e. the "very specific type of field" which makes the symbols "come alive," to their operations that they were not even close to understanding. This is my guess anyway.

As to why the main object would have mirrored halves, it doesn't seem too hard to speculate an answer. If an "anit-gravity" field (I'm not sure I fully buy the anti-gravity rhetoric) were emanating from the device, there may be a good reason why it needs to be symmetrical. If the symbols ("Isaac" was adamant that they were different from a language) in a peculiar way maintain the field then they too may need to be symmetrical, i.e. mirror images of each other. As for the proposed lighting anomolies of the images, I am not an expert on graphic renedition but I don't need to be to postulate an answer. If what "Isaac" says is true, that the artifacts have a cloaking capability, why couldn't they absorb, scatter, and reflect light in peculiar ways even when they are not fully cloaking themselves? Photographs of them would then exhibit lighting anomolies. I'm not saying that this is what has happened, only that it is a possibility.

But I agree with SuicideVirus that the release of information concerning the drones in general seems almost staged (carefully staged). On the other hand, I also tend to think that they are real objects.

As a side note: I find it strange that "Isaac" wants to contact witnesses to the sightings and "impart" some kind of information to help them deal with their experiences, when he himself claims to have no clear understanding of the "alien" connection.