reply to post by Siddharta
Cool, Sidd. Thank you for bringing the mirrored image in the Isaac stuff up again. That was one of the funniest and most obvious bits in the whole
mess. When I noticed the "writing" was even reversed, I laughed out loud. I like your idea about the "signature." Photo manipulation by Mr Flip.
The excuses are comical, of course, but in a sad way. Mr Flip has my admiration. I'm sounding more like Sys all the time!
I want to reiterate that the burden of proof is still on the claimants here, even though they are still anonymous and strangely silent all these
months. Their proxies are loud and obnoxious, and the phrase burden-of-proof is anathema to them. Kind of like waving a crucifix at a vampire. But
anyway, it is not up to the sensible people to prove that the moon is not made of a Hollywood set, and we are not required to prove this is a hoax.
That does not stop us from digging, and lately y'all have actually been proving it's a hoax anyway. That's very cool.
Putting a big red "Authentic" stamp on a low-grade photo is a very professional way to go, by the way. I guess that's what separates LMH, DRT, all
the other more discerning Researchers from the likes of Bruce Maccabee, who just uses careful language and real science to back up his findings. Too
bad we can't get Dr. Maccabee to give this mess a second glance.
[edit on 4/27/08 by Double_Nought_Spy]


