It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They only allowed her 30 minutes for open phones since the show was running over. Did you read my e-mails in full? In the first e-mail I noted that someone called claiming the CARET thing was a hoax (which is irrelevant for this matter at hand) abd then George quickly tried to get him off the air, not wanting to talk to him about it at all. Many of us were stunned as to how that phoe call was handled. Here we are waiting for this topic all week, and then it never got talked about (except for the initial little blurb that Linda hinted where we can find new Isaac info at her site). But nothing was talked in great detail about Isaac or CARET at all with the Professor of Electronic Computing and Engineering. Where did that guest go? Why didn't Linda inform the public listeners that the topic had changed? Why had it changed? Did she find it to be a hoax? Did she get stopped by the FCC for government silencing of the issue? I really need to know what's going on here, and so do the many ATS members who are just about to cancel their subscriptions to C2C and Earthfiles unless we find out what really happened. Please forward every e-mail I sent to George and now to you... please send them to Linda and have her contact me directly at the cell number I put in the previous e-mail. (you can find it a few lines down).
Originally posted by yuefo
But you're conveniently ignoring what I've said repeatedly--by saying, in writing, that the materials aren't his but rather pilfered, he has reliquinshed rights to the property. I said it before and I'll say it again, you can take a document like that, his own document, into any court and walk out victorious. You can't lie about ownership, in writing, and turn around and sue someone.
I forwarded your note to Linda. I suspect that the CARET material was bumped for her
breaking news on the East Field crop formation.
This is a Forward of my July 24, 2007, email to Lex, COAST Webmaster, before my July 27, COAST news updates. In fact, I sent several emails, but Lex was on vacation and my emails were not reaching the web person in charge that week.
Your hostility is puzzling because on Friday, July 27, to specifically complement my COAST appearance, I reported other material from Isaac not reported before - "Clarifications and Comments by Isaac."
That Earthfiles report includes higher resolution images of the Big Basin "drone" and a close-up on one of the center boxes that closely resembles some of the CARET document diagrams provided by Isaac back in late June. In the first few minutes of the July 27 COAST broadcast, I referenced the COAST audience to the new Isaac comments and the photos to read and see.
When I first contacted George about an academic who was enthusiastic about the Isaac and CARET material, the interview was interesting from an outside computer specialist's speculation, but not breaking news. Along with a CARET update, I also told George I would give an update on crop formation news. Over the next two weeks, the unfolding crop formation events in the East Field of Wiltshire, England, and the 100-eyewitness sighting of lights moving into and holding a pattern over The One Elm pub in Stratford-upon-Avon became important breaking news and the focus of my July 27 COAST news updates.
Thank you for your response. It was apparently C2C's fault then for not changing their website information. It was somewhat of a letdown since many of us were looking forward to hearing a whole show about the CARET documents. I will present this information to the ATS community.
It would be very much appreciated if you could arrange some correspondence with Isaac and perhaps myself or one of the owners of ATS. We are a little confused as
to the "Isaac clarifications" that you reported. There seem to be some discrepancies with the dates of the e-mails. We are puzzled with the fact that you received the clarifications from him only a day after the initial disclosure of his info, yet you held his response for a month before reporting it to us.
If you could, I would appreciate clarification of this issue. I have been part of the minority of ATS that believes much of what Isaac has claimed, and would like to be able to further provide proof of his claims to the community.
Thank you very much for your time,
My Earthfiles report clearly states:
I emailed these issues to Isaac and on June 27, 2007, I received his replies in two separate emails indicated by receipt times, which Isaac gave me permission to share in an Earthfiles follow-up. My delay in reporting these emails is that I had an indication from Isaac that I might be able to interview him by phone. So, I waited, hoping the interview would occur. But to date, that has not happened.
So will you be able to put me in touch with him? If not, can you please direct him to our ATS thread? We all have many questions we would like answered, please.
Originally posted by agent violet
Thats just it (as I stated many, many pages ago. and it was then refuted by others, and then after more pages it was revived) Isaac responded to questions that weren't even asked yet.
"This is a big hoax. For one thing, the US Government would NEVER allow this information to left in the hands of some worker. Another thing, the manual does not look anything like a legal NASA or a government document either. The pictures of the 'artifact' are photoshopped and I can tell you that the aliens DO not label every single part as pictured. The anti-grav unit pictured is fake. The photos of the drone on the floor are model parts. The configuration of all the drones sent in to you and others is something the aliens would never design as all these designs pictured show gross misuse of space. All their ships are based on the use of space. Not one inch to them is wasted and if you look at the history of 'probes' from EBE's they are SMALL and fast. I think you have been had. I am surprised that you and George Noory etc. are easily tricked by this. I would definitely check with your reliable contacts deep in the 'Know' and find out for yourself."
"Looking at the so-called 'documentation' that goes with this stuff, the text-formatting is obviously done with relatively recent vintage page-layout software. You can tell by the perfect nature of the block justification.
"That type of extremely precise (even in word-spacing), indeed perfect, text-formatting DID NOT EXIST IN 1985, particularly in a laboratory or even corporate environment. After looking at all of the fancy 'documents,' including the Macromedia Freehand or Adobe Illustrator-designed 'alien diagrams,' I state now and for the RECORD that this whole thing is a HOAX, and will be proven to be such."
I realize now that I did not make this clear, but I should clarify that I am not responsible for the blacking out of the Q4-86 report.
Originally posted by NGC2736
pj, your threats are not hollow, my friend. As soon as I leave this site I will be contacting C2C and advising them of my displeasure.
I will also advise them that my own website will put up a prominent notice within 48 hours that they (C2C) are not forthcoming, highlighting LMH as being most unwilling to communicate. Please advise them, and use my name, that the ripples of unrest are well founded.
IF one of the main players will come to ATS for some questions and answers, then I will naturally reconsider. BUT, please stress to them that I, and others, will not be put off on this matter. I don't care how it inconveniences them, or how bad their schedule is, they dug this hole themselves, so now it's time to start digging back out.
Feel free to quote me.
[edit on 8-8-2007 by NGC2736]
Originally posted by agent violet
you can now see Isaac answers a question to a question that was not asked(!)
at least IMO