It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX] Isaac CARET - Drones [HOAX]

page: 105
185
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Sorry its a lil one but I have nothing more to add; I find it just as weird, and that's twice now someone has 'disappeared' in a post. The first letter is a nought, that's why he doesn't come up, but his SECOND post is definitely missing.

www.abovetopsecret.com...&mem=0mikron




posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 11:03 AM
link   
I have asked the staff to take a look at the problem of disappearing posts on this thread.

Hopefully some information will come to light.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 11:06 AM
link   
Thanks ej, I started with a cut & paste from a post so it must have had a capital O. My mind locked in on Omicron, like the letter, instead of something like zero micron.

I wonder about this missing post. After all the posts of people name calling back and forth I thought one post backing up his original RV claim was significant. At least if it is a hoax (the drones don't exist as real craft or as a model), it would tend to discredit his RVing group in the future.

Maybe someone will fill us in as to why and I suspect there is a proper reason.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 11:16 AM
link   
While we wait for an answer on the posts that go to never never land, does anyone have any idea if the post I made on page 104 has merit?

I would hate to waste a lot of time trying to sort out numbers from script if there's a flaw in my concept.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 12:10 PM
link   
By going through the members profile for 0mikron you can see his post here:

0mikron's one and only post!

Hope this helps out...



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 12:30 PM
link   
The "Omikron Mystery" explained:

Sorry for taking so long to back here, I have been up to my eye balls in the business side of the site (BIG stuff coming soon
)...

The Omikron mystery is nothing more than a stupid error on my part. I wanted to quote parts of his scathing rant and rebuff them and I hit "delete" instead of "quote". Thankfully Pjslug has it quoted in one of his threads so the data is still there.

There is no hack only a late night, stupid blunder by an admin, me.


Apologies all around.

Excluding user error, the only posts that intentionally get removed are either off topic, breaches of the TAC, or requested (double posts etc...). Unfortunately, human beings operate this site and mistakes DO happen.

Springer...



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 12:53 PM
link   
Great new there Springer. I figured as much. And like many folks here, I haven't seen much usefulness out of RV. My opinion, the post by Omikron has a fifty-fifty chance of being right. Just like flipping a coin.

Now I'm off to see if I can find any connection on seperating numbers from script in the Isaac papers.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Thanks Springer. I suspected there was a plausible reason for the missing post. I have faith in ATS. His statements, as you state, are still documented in the thread. I hate to fess up, but I have done similar 'oops' actions a time or two though my years with computers.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   
I had to stop looking at the drone script in the 'other' forum, purely because it was so damn annoying; it physically makes me sick, literally, and I don't know why. I do have a preponderance to migraine, which should have no effect, but its just a thought (and I do take a lot of medication for pain, so read into that what you will)...

I do think some of the scribble is numbers, but again, the drones and 'swirly' diagram seem to make no intrinsic sense, in that they are not sentences either backwards or forwards, upsidedown, etc they are just random letters and numbers. What it does sort of give credence to is that whoever wrote it if it IS a hoax speaks English in my mind purely because it reads better left to right, and does generally follow English grammatical sense.

But, it does come out gibberish if we assume that the 'To Protect' is true, and since this thread is about Isaac and his documents, we have to logically assume the gravity generator picture and the swirly thing is from the same source. Its odd to be honest that the gravity generator text and the swirly text (since logic dictates its called a PRIMER so it should be some form of human-to-alien text translator) do NOT match, in that the generator has long, English like sentences, but the swirly diagram is just chunks.

ALSO: Anyone noticed that there is the faithful 'square box' of fonts in the swirly diagram? That and the weird curly overlapped lines to me say someone made this out of some existing and some own-made fonts.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 06:51 PM
link   
ej, How do you arrive at the "left to right" idea? Is this based on the connection with the idea that part of it "seems" to be translated to the word "protect"?

I'm still seeing the "numbers" as being bracketed. This would at least narrow down the number of "letters" to try and decode.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 07:10 PM
link   
Thanks for shedding light on it, Springer.

Also, I have said several times and I wish someone could help with this: The characters are very similar to Japanese characters, so if anyone could provide a comparitive alphabet of English and Japanese it would be appreciated. I strongly feel that we need to look in this direction, and I think this will help us decode or uncover part of the primer. Take a look at various Japanese text on the internet and you will see the similarity. There must be someone here who speaks, reads and writes Japanese?? Please help if you can.

P.S. I don't think there is anything at all to the "To Protect" resemblance. I think it is just a coincidence that the letters look that way. Nothing else in the primer resembles anything in English.

[edit on 7/14/2007 by pjslug]



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 07:13 PM
link   
i think EJ is putting emphasis on the fact that the text referred to as 'to protect' or what ever it mite say is neatly placed left to right or right to left unlike the diagrams of the 'language' where everything is everywhere. (theres no left,right,up,or down way to read it?

[edit on 14-7-2007 by fill0000]



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 07:21 PM
link   
Have we at the least decided that the CARET documents and the drones share the same language? I would try a picture to document comparison, but someone with a faster system could be done while I was getting the first couple of pictures up.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 07:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by pjslug
Take a look at various Japanese text on the internet and you will see the similarity. There must be someone here who speaks, reads and writes Japanese?? Please help if you can.


It sure won't be me. I've addressed this issue in around 6 different posts.

It ain't Japanese.
Nihongo jya nai.
日本語じゃない。



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 08:13 PM
link   


Have we at the least decided that the CARET documents and the drones share the same language? I would try a picture to document comparison, but someone with a faster system could be done while I was getting the first couple of pictures up.


well the drones, the photocopies and the hardware photos all share the same 'symbols' so I guess we can agree this?

I've been looking for patterns of letters or matching letter combinations from the hardware photos to the worksheet photos but no luck... its so so so complex hmmm



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 08:31 PM
link   
Hi,
i understand that you feel this place is quite unique, and that's how you like it. But there are other places on the web where people do really work hard on all that.
Here he but one example :




posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 09:36 PM
link   
Nemo, thank you. It seems I am not alone in some of my views. I'm late to the game, but still in the hunt.


But I fear we need a Rosetta Stone to ever make headway.



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 10:14 PM
link   
This site has been around for some time. Since I was a kid and could ride around on a bike its been there so we are talking 1974+ It is not near the Industrial Park or PARC.

From a distance. You can make out the outline of a large cage type antenna. The poles are wood, and are interconnected with wires.


ANother pic of the poles from a distance. These are to the left of the first pic and we are facing east


The approach road


What looks like a one time keyless entry system or call box. Note the gold mailbox next to the silver keypad. The No trespassing sign to the right and the barbed wire on the cyclone fence. Despite the look of this the fence is in good shape and does no appear old at all


Closeup of the box



The main white building old, but not decrepid. did not have my binocs but there is stuff int he windows.












[edit on 7/14/07 by FredT]



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 10:22 PM
link   
Why this spot? At the time frame we are talking about it would have been pretty isolated. Lots of power (still) going into the buildings.

It would have been withing 2-3 miles of Moffett Field NAS and NASA Ames. material could move to the field by ship (its on the marsh area next to the bay

etc etc etc


Edit here are the GPS coord

37.445251,-122.112173



[edit on 7/14/07 by FredT]



posted on Jul, 14 2007 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Maybe I'm reading too much into what you are saying, but are you implying that this place is purposely made to look old? Is there any activity that has led you to think this is still a working "whatever"?

And is there something that led you to check this place out as opposed to other spots in your area?



new topics

top topics



 
185
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join