It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Stanford Industrial Park
After World War II, universities were experiencing enormous demand due to returning students. To address the financial demands of Stanford's growth requirements, and to provide local employment opportunities for graduating students , Frederick Terman proposed the leasing of Stanford's lands for use as an office park , named the Stanford Industrial Park (later Stanford Research Park). Leases were limited to high technology companies. Its first tenant was Varian Associates, founded by Stanford alumni in the 1930s to build military radar components. However, Terman also found venture capital for civilian technology start-ups . One of the major success stories was Hewlett-Packard. Founded in Packard's garage by Stanford graduates William Hewlett and David Packard, Hewlett-Packard moved its offices into the Stanford Research Park slightly after 1953 .
Originally posted by 0mikron
Hello Everyone, I won't be posting anymore on this website (not that I ever posted before anyways) as it seems like nothing but flame wars go on here and no real, reasoned and objective research or study or debate.
Just name calling and flames = useless. I'm only posting this to make good on my promise. Those of you who believed it was a real object are now vindicated. I don't care if anyone believes me or not. I know the truth of its reality.
My realization that the circles might be used for patterning within our minds and brains arose out of reading the Isaac 'Caret' material, and thinking about some of the imagery on the strange 'drones' that have recently been seen in northern California skies.
But what if the Isaac material is fake and the drones a hoax? To me, that doesn't invalidate my realization about using the circles for mind patterning. But, in any case, the debunking of both the Isaac material and the drones has been a non-starter so far.
I am not too surprised that NONE of the drones debunking addresses the issue of the witnesses. How can it? The testimony of so many people is, in the end, irrefutable. But, to the debunkers, it is as if the eyewitness simply don't exist. Instead, we're being told that it's all some sort of subtle 'viral marketing' scheme for the Transformers movie or the Halo game.
why should those things only appear in the usa. much more interesting than the cgi angle imo.)
Well that (the above snide reply) did it...
11 11 is post banned for at least three days, I can only hope if he desires to return to these fora that he achieves the civility level of an adult.
I did my level BEST to explain to him how to interact in the "ATS WAY" that demands courtesy and warned him twice because his data was great.
It was his delivery that was sorely lacking and beneath the minimum level required to paricipate here at AboveTopSecret.com, and that is that.
Originally posted by ejsaunders
Originally posted by 11 11
This is dirt on the lens.
Uhh, how can you have dirt on a CGI lense?
Originally posted by NGC2736
You know, I just had a weird thought float past, so I'm laying out a little scenario here to see if maybe we've taken the wrong focus on this.
***The Following "Story" Is NOT True, being made up to highlight things.***
I work for agency XYZ of the US government, and we have a problem that has been beyond our best minds to solve for some time. We have these items that were "found", for which we cannot find a use, or even a clue who made them.
John Bartholdi, director of SCL's research program, is a professor in ISyE and holds the Manhattan Associates Chair in Supply Chain Management. Dr. Bartholdi graduated in 1968 with a B.S. degree in mathematics from the University of Florida and then served two tours of duty in southeast Asia as a paratrooper in a Naval Special Warfare unit. He returned to the University of Florida to complete the Ph.D. program in operations research in 1977 and later served on the faculties at the University of Michigan, the Shanghai Institute of Mechanical Engineering, and the National University of Singapore. Dr. Bartholdi was named a “Presidential Young Investigator” by the National Science Foundation for 1984-1989. His research work has been supported by the Defense Logistics Agency, the Office of Naval Research, and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, among others. He is a principal in the consulting firm, Integrated Warehouse Design, Inc.
Dr. Bartholdi teaches supply chain issues, primarily warehousing, at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and in SCL's professional education program. His research centers on problems in warehousing and distribution, but he reserves some time to pursue wider-ranging interests, including mechanics, politics, computer science, geography, and biology.
Originally posted by Outrageo
Fred - I see the array on the roof; are you sure it's not the same size, simply scaled down from your perspective? Also the units are presently pointing away from the sun (see evening (19:15) shadow of light pole). Perhaps they have simply rotated and reset themselves for the morning?
Originally posted by 0mikron
In a previous post I said that I would have remote viewers gather data concerning these objects. Each remote viewer involved, excepting me, did not know what they were RVing.
The conclusions after analysis of the data collection is that it is a real object in the sky. The parts displayed on the isaac website are also real objects. That is all we know at this point. We do not know what they are for or who made them.
I don't care what the naysayers think. Most of them, from what I have read, are just closed minded people who want to argue to make themselves feel superior to others or bolster their own egos.
I won't be posting anymore on this website (not that I ever posted before anyways) as it seems like nothing but flame wars go on here and no real, reasoned and objective research or study or debate. Just name calling and flames = useless. I'm only posting this to make good on my promise. Those of you who believed it was a real object are now vindicated. I don't care if anyone believes me or not. I know the truth of its reality.
Enough said. End of discussion. Futher bantering concerning the reality of these objects is pointless. The questions that should be addressed now are what is its purpose and who made it.
Learn to RV and you will find Truth too.
Originally posted by chunder
Isaac stated -
"PACL was hidden in an office complex owned entirely by the military but made to look like an unassuming tech company. From the street, all you could see was what appeared to be a normal parking lot with a gate and a guard booth, and a 1-story building inside with a fictitious name and logo".