posted on Jun, 27 2007 @ 04:25 PM
thanks for the praise
i think i understood well. the thing is: in theory A you have 1, 2 ,3 and 4. in theory B you have 5, 6, 7 and 8
you are saying:
1, 2, 3 are proven and not 4
5 and 6 are proven, not 7 and 8
so A is more likley to be true.
well the problem is in the way you build up your theories A and B because 1, 2, 3.... may not relate to each other at all... maybe that theory A
should be :1 , 2, 6, 8 and theory B: 3,4,5 and 7.
in short: the methodology is wrong leading to wrong result.
anyway: I am not a star when it comes to maths. just want to warn you: if you use this theory in "real life" you may have some problems. (unless you
use it on purpose as part of a speech in order to convince people)