Very strange. I agree that we know little about the planet we live on. Most of us are spending far too much time looking up, and not enough under our feet IMHO. I dont believe the hollow earth people stuff but I think more money needs to be spent on geology

Originally posted by Muaddib
Anyways. This is very interesting as it shows that a change in the Sun's output will affect this magma layer underneath the Earth which in turn affects the Earth.

It doesn't say any such thing.

The researchers are using this small current to measure the conductivity of the underlying rock, different types of rock possess varying conductivity. It's a way to 'image' the structure underground.

I suppose changes in the intensity of the solar wind might affect the strength of the very weak electric current in the magma ..... not sure how that in turn affects climate though Although since it's changes in this current that allowed the discovery of the magma, one assumes any variation in solar wind is already accounted for.

Anyways. This is very interesting as it shows that a change in the Sun's output will affect this magma layer underneath the Earth which in turn affects the Earth.

The article in question makes no mention of this...

Although since it's changes in this current that allowed the discovery of the magma

The changes in current at different depths are caused by variation in the chemical makeup not intensity of the solar wind.

It is quite interesting but when you consider that there is the Yellowstone mega-volcano caldera and then there is the long valley California mega-volcano caldera and then there are the volcanoes that run up the spine of the western hemisphere as part of the ring of fire; its not very surprising or should I say unexpected.

But as for the rest of it is is just one more piece of Muaddib's never ending campaign of obstruction, disinformation and spin against the theory human involvement is global warming; and should be taken as such with, not just a shaker of salt, but a pound or two.

Why in the world are some of you claiming "it does not say such thing", when I clearly bolded, and I quote....

The current is created when the solar wind, a continuous flow of charged atomic particles emitted by the sun, interact with Earth’s magnetic field, called the magnetosphere.

But i guess some people really have to bring down any and every evidence that "there are natural factors which affect the Earth's climate which in turn might be a threat to the claims of some people about AGW"....

[edit on 27-6-2007 by Muaddib]

Interesting, I guess because the molten lava is flowing it has a way to move without having to come to the surface.

But I kind of find hard to believe that is moving around the earth. I think is excaping to the surface some where under the sea.

Look at the volcano in Hawaii it is the only one in the world that the lava is not as thick making posible for it to flow freely.

I wonder if the lava found under the American Southwest is like the one in Hawaii.

Originally posted by marg6043
.......................
I wonder if the lava found under the American Southwest is like the one in Hawaii.

Humm, I am not completely sure, but it is very possible that this layer connects with layers of magma which are closer to the Earth's surface.

Deep in the Earth these magma currents have to affect the upper layers of the Earth, so they should be connected, but since noone can see it, it is a theory. We see the results as in volcanoes erupting etc.

The Earth's upper layers are in movement, the tectonic plates, since it is believed that under the lithosphere the fluid underneath is denser, (this layer which was found under Arizona should be part of this denser magma layer) making the lithosphere float and move around, but since noone can go down there, these are just some logical guesses.

[edit on 27-6-2007 by Muaddib]

Are you having a hard time getting people to believe you anymore Muaddib? Are you having credibility issues? It could stem from the fact that you are beginning to sound like a broken record and those of us who remember records don't like them when they skip.

ANYTHING to to blame global warming on to deny man's involvement.... note I said involvement, not sole blame.

Next I expect you to start blaming cow farts for it.

I am not connoisseur of lava but I spend 3 years in Hawaii and is amazing how Mauna loa keeps seeping lava all the time and changing the Island shape.

If this magma is flowing it has to be many other areas that it's getting to the surface.

It will be interesting to see if scientist can find the magma areas of scape through the earth, to make better predictions.

Originally posted by grover
Are you having a hard time getting people to believe you anymore Muaddib? Are you having credibility issues? It could stem from the fact that you are beginning to sound like a broken record and those of us who remember records don't like them when they skip.
........

Mr. Clown..... i did not write up this article, nor made the discovery..... do you have actually anything positive to add, or are you just clowning around like always?...

Oh btw Mr. Clown, as far as i know, opinions do not make facts...so just because some people disagree, it doesn't mean their opinion is right.

i gave data to back my statements and did not rely merely in opinion like some people around here do always...

[edit on 27-6-2007 by Muaddib]

I am just making fun of the fact that you try and tie everything but humans into a cause for global warming. It does get funny after awhile. How many things have you blamed it on now?

Muaddib, you said this...

as it shows that a change in the Sun's output will affect this magma layer underneath the Earth which in turn affects the Earth.

Now compare it to the bolded quote below.

The current is created when the solar wind, a continuous flow of charged atomic particles emitted by the sun, interact with Earth’s magnetic field, called the magnetosphere.

The articles in question does not mention solar variations and does not even speculate what effects that may have, that is your own highly polarized and opinionated addition. We do not know how much effect this may have. It may have a minimal effect or it may have a huge effect. I'm leaning towards the former at the moment as there isn't enough data to support a hypothesis either way.

[edit on 27-6-2007 by sardion2000]

Originally posted by grover
I am just making fun of the fact that you try and tie everything but humans into a cause for global warming. It does get funny after awhile. How many things have you blamed it on now?

....... Do humans have anything to do with the cause of what it is explained in this article?....... Who is trying to "tie everything as being caused by humans to an article which has nothing to do with humans being the cause?........

[edit on 27-6-2007 by Muaddib]

There you go spinning again... just a few posts up you wrote:

"But i guess some people really have to bring down any and every evidence that "there are natural factors which affect the Earth's climate which in turn might be a threat to the claims of some people about AGW"

SO... just who brought the subject of global warming up first?
answer: You did Muaddib.

Originally posted by Muaddib
Why in the world are some of you claiming "it does not say such thing", when I clearly bolded, and I quote....

The current is created when the solar wind, a continuous flow of charged atomic particles emitted by the sun, interact with Earth’s magnetic field, called the magnetosphere.

Yeah, that's what magnetotellurics depends on.

There is a magnetic force from the earth itself, which interacts with charged particles. This induces a weak electrical current.

Now you need to show how changes in this weak current affect magma, and consequently how this will affect climate.

What you have is fairly isolated stuff that you're connecting.

These researchers are using a particular technique to 'image' under the surface. They find some magma, some people are interested in the nature of these type of layers, they might have some interesting and unknown effects. OK, that's cool.

A second study you just posted shows that rotation rate of the earth may be very important to climate. Again, OK that's cool.

Then you extend...

Therefore, as the technique the original study used depends on telluric currents, this means the solar wind can affect the magma in some way relevant to climate.

Quite a tenuous connection to say the least. Not saying it is impossible, just saying the inference is not supported by what you have.



In essence, you're missing step 2...

[edit on 27-6-2007 by melatonin]

its ok all ive worked it out for Muaddib
now.... the cause of GW is actually because the moon is moving away at a rate of 1/4inch per annum....
that extra inch makes all the differance as we all know and just about 10 years ago the moon moved just that little bit too far from us.... the gravity of the moon now is attracting the heat up from the molten core to the moon through space.

No I have to agree with grover though I work in the area of environmental management and engineering, and I do know what I am talking about, I get paid for it and have letters after my name etc... ive stopped posting anything on this subject because of Muaddib
spin and political exxon type approach...I have started contributing less and less to this site due to the fact that ignorance is not being denied, but encouraged and ats is a forum in some cases for actually propogating lies, faleshoods and much ignorance...

sigh

however I must also say that he is right on this one.... this is a good post and good find Muaddib.....except the very very tenuous "theory" that it may affect weather.

maybe just maybe now you know whats its like to have facts and the truth ripped apart by others?


regards

Elf

[edit on 27-6-2007 by MischeviousElf]