DoD creates computerised alternate reality - SWS, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times
Topic started on 24-6-2007 @ 10:03 AM by SimonGray
I recently came across this news article about a piece of software called Synthetic Environment for Analysis and Simulations - SEAS, which has been adopted and tailored by the Deparment of Defence into a simulation program called Sentient World Simulation.



The DOD is developing a parallel to Planet Earth, with billions of individual "nodes" to reflect every man, woman, and child this side of the dividing line between reality and AR.

Called the Sentient World Simulation (SWS), it will be a "synthetic mirror of the real world with automated continuous calibration with respect to current real-world information", according to a concept paper for the project.


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.






Yank a country's water supply. Stage a military coup. SWS will tell you what happens next.

"The idea is to generate alternative futures with outcomes based on interactions between multiple sides," said Purdue University professor Alok Chaturvedi, co-author of the SWS concept paper.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


Original source for both quotes above -
www.theregister.com...

I think this is quite a scary concept to be created, and could/would be used to see just how far military/government interaction could be pushed to it's absolute limits to test citizen revolt and response.

The intricacy of the simulation software is obviously very advanced, and is even being pitched to DARPA and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for possible applications.


reply posted on 24-6-2007 @ 10:36 AM by Jbird
I think what's scarier, is,
someone in quasi-command, may eventually,
treat the results,of one of these simulations, as fact,
and implement actions based on
this 21st Century version of 'Risk'.

Even seemingly irrelavent events, can sometimes
trigger unforeseen consequences, leading to a totally
different outcome, as most RTSG gamers know.

www.theregister.com... ...a whole-Earth simulation will be a colossal challenge.

"(SWS) is a hungry beast," Blank said. "A lot of data will be required to make this thing even credible."


That would be a lot of data input. Who's gonna do it?

Would be great to see a simulation , tho!


[edit on 24-6-2007 by Jbird]


reply posted on 24-6-2007 @ 10:48 AM by Jbird
Now, this part, I can see as being useful.

www.theregister.com...
...who nevertheless said the simulations might be useful for anticipating some scenarios.



reply posted on 24-6-2007 @ 11:03 AM by Jbird
www.theregister.com...
The way to test it would be to set the program at some point in the past
and let it run to a given date, then check the predictions against actual history.


Very insightful idea, from the comments page, I thought.



[edit on 24-6-2007 by Jbird]


reply posted on 24-6-2007 @ 11:20 AM by AcesInTheHole
Originally posted by Jbird
www.theregister.com...
The way to test it would be to set the program at some point in the past
and let it run to a given date, then check the predictions against actual history.


Very insightful idea, from the comments page, I thought.



[edit on 24-6-2007 by Jbird]


So in reality it won't be based on history, it will be based on history books to be exact. But do the writers of these books truly reflect the feelings of the people at that point in time? I doubt it.

As I said before, it's a scary thought that they could be interfacing this type of program with the verichips. Knowing the "collective mood" of the people could be used to dictate their decisions.


reply posted on 24-6-2007 @ 12:39 PM by America Jones
I wonder if this is related to "Vanilla World"

www.secondaryscreening.net...


Originally posted by Jbird

That would be a lot of data input. Who's gonna do it?



Look for whoever is working with holographic data storage and quantum computing.

www.nitrd.gov...

HTMT is interesting in this regard.


reply posted on 25-6-2007 @ 02:46 AM by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by Jbird
That would be a lot of data input. Who's gonna do it?

And are they using data right down to the personal level of every Citizen?...
Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
Well, here's where all the social data mining comes in, right?
Google's building databases of what you like to look at. That probably tells a lot about your interests.

If so, you must also consider whether or not they use Constitutionally/legally-gained data, as well; The intelligence-gathering "powers" of the Patriot Act comes to mind here.
After all, there's already a lot of Federal Agencies in place to "data-mine" the public & not all of them exist Constitutionally or operate within legal parameters. Others are privately-owned & operated commercial interests (such as the Federal Reserve Bank) that operate with "quasi-government/legal" sanction!

Originally posted by AcesInTheHole
As I said before, it's a scary thought that they could be interfacing this type of program with the verichips.

In order to set us up for actual interfacing into the system...
Originally posted by Mechanic 32
Welcome to the real life Matrix???

Now this is a scary combination of thoughts, it is! Puts the phrase "couch-potato" on a whole new level, doesn't it?
Well, if they ever come out with a cyberpunk-style of hardwired interfacing with computers, I'll just say "no"...Right up until the point where they either kill me or force-drug me into an insensitive stupor to put me on the surgical slab.


reply posted on 26-6-2007 @ 09:59 AM by America Jones
Maybe you don't always have to give them the data they expect.

Yes, they are picking through your electronic trash. So leave them a few stinkers. These systems depend on the statistical consistency of "participants."

Expect that these systems are intended to become part of a
homeostatic feedback circuit. Just like clocks and calendars help you feel hungry at noon, relax on weekends, generous on December 25, solemn on September 11, and patriotic on July 4. All sorts of interests seek to ensure that you feel appropriately at these times, and have many ways of receiving appropriate feedback in this regard.

"only by manipulating humans ever more into skinnerian rats, robots, buying automata, homeostatically adjusted conformists and opportunists (or, bluntly speaking, into morons and zombies) can this great society follow its progress toward ever increasing gross national product..." (p.206 General System Theory, Ludwig von Bertalanffy, 1968)



[edit on 26-6-2007 by America Jones]


reply posted on 26-6-2007 @ 10:28 AM by America Jones
Oh yeah, and you know all those fun surveys MySpace advertisers are always trying to get you to take? What's your IQ, and such? Don't think those are exempted from Internet traffic intercepted by the central government. In fact, it may be relevant to surveillance systems whether or not you even respond to solicitations to take these surveys.

I hear that "memes" are all the rage among the online kids these days...
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Next week all military bases go on 3-week alert
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags
The US Military Can Clearly Afford A Major Budget Cut
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
DARPA Cheetah runs faster than Usain
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Air Force Seeking Cyber-Weapons
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Space Enabled Effects for Military Engagements (Seeme)
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags