It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
The photos are DEFINATLY fake. Learn some basics, then you can analyse the photos yourself, instead of trusting NASAs judgement.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I'm a photographer so I think I know the basics. I haven't even seen any "NASA judgement" anywhere and I think everything about the photos is perfectly natural.
Originally posted by Yandros
Originally posted by harry20007
Just to deal with the right image lolol. OK, pretty basic, you turned down the contrast (not high contrast as stated in image, the left images that are black and white are high contrast) to see image of the sun... if not it would be white, soooo ? the cross hairs appear. Now whack up the image to true exposure (being that the sun is pretty bright) and your cross hairs will vanish, due to light compensation and stuff.
Learn basic photography and you'll understand the basics of how light reacts on film! Most of us (photographers) cant believe how easy it is to wipe away these pipe dreams.
Originally posted by Yandros
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I'm a photographer so I think I know the basics. I haven't even seen any "NASA judgement" anywhere and I think everything about the photos is perfectly natural.
Ok so you would know that daylight photographs are consistently lit. And that the shadows should run parallel, or as subject to perspective…
You also know that halos do not form unless you are photographing in an atmosphere containing ice crystals. And the fact this sun has an obvious rainbow halo cannot be lens flare because lens flare is already evident in the little circles…
You also know that the sun should be burning the film right out of the camera, being unshielded from UV and completely polarized…
And that the intensity of a heavily overexposed patch of film (as with a standard photograph of the sun) should not change in intensity…
Do you not?
Originally posted by junglelord
I thank God one member mentioned that halos are from ICE PARTICLES in the atmosphere...one voice of reason, kudos to you.
The shadows all point to the light source, where else would they point? Perspective is the key word indeed.
Originally posted by harry20007
Ever heard of Filters? Go look at filters used for taking FILM not digital shots of the sun. Filters can creat halos too.
Originally posted by Yandros
Originally posted by harry20007
Just to deal with the right image lolol. OK, pretty basic, you turned down the contrast (not high contrast as stated in image, the left images that are black and white are high contrast) to see image of the sun... if not it would be white, soooo ? the cross hairs appear. Now whack up the image to true exposure (being that the sun is pretty bright) and your cross hairs will vanish, due to light compensation and stuff.
Wrong wrong wrong. I turned up the contrast to give better separation between slight variations in colour. I turned down the brightness so that you could see these variations.
Now if you look at the left side there. Go find those images. Do whatever you please with them, you will not find the crosshair. It is not grayed out, it is simply gone.
Learn basic photography and you'll understand the basics of how light reacts on film! Most of us (photographers) cant believe how easy it is to wipe away these pipe dreams.
Originally posted by harry20007
This is an area that I need clarified. What are you trying to say? That we never went there or??? not sure what your trying to proove.
Originally posted by harry20007
You may used that facility abit but you also altered the exposure!