Nasa...pulling the wool over or eyes?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 8-1-2004 @ 05:30 AM by heelstone
Retired astronauts Gordon Cooper and Dr. Edgar Mitchell have both publicly proclaimed the incident in New Mexico in 1947 was a real extraterrestrial ship crash. Cooper claims some military friends told him. Mitchell claims to have read secret government documents that prove it that have not been released to the public. Of course there are other people that proclaim this too, such as the late Colonel Phillip Corso and Major Jesse Marcel who were more intimately involved with the event. Anyway, it seems as though at least some government people are certain of our government having retrieved alien technology.

There seems to be enough proof of UFO cover up anyway with regards to events like the 1967 Edwards AFB case that was part of Project Blue Book, the 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident, and the testimony that could happen from groups such as The Disclosure Project if an investigation could ever get started.

Since NASA is part of our government, of course they are involved in any cover up of potential extraterrestrial information. They are the public outlet for such endeavors and as such have to actually lie to the public instead of simply not communicating with us like other silent government branches regarding this information.

IMO, all our current space endeavors are lame events done in an attempt to pacify the public and keep us blinded to any other information that could threaten the security of the nation if we were to find out about it (meaning we would tear apart the government in anger if we found out). This latest Mars probe is no exception.

[Edited on 8-1-2004 by heelstone]


reply posted on 8-1-2004 @ 05:50 AM by AlnilamOmega
please see this thread for my explanation on the matter.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

heres a few excerpts from it for you lazy bums

the motive is obvious. if you have control over one direct flow of multimedia from a planet, you don't have to worry about funny pictures like that Mars Face or a ship docking with Olympus Mons (made that up)

if you have several space agencies that you may NOT have direct or indirect control of, you will have all of that multimedia being spread around like a virus. an intelligence virus.

this is why on CSPAN they show you Spirit's work in progress, but with goofy 3-d vision (the red/blue on black and white pictures)... AND they restrict certain pictures. I caught the guy say at least once, "and here is another picture of the curious large rock formations. hmmm, i guess not." Because the picture remained the same as before. And he proceeded, like a programmed dolt, speaking of the picture that shouldve replaced the old one but didn't, "You could see a truly alien surface around here, and we were talking about sending Spirit to investigate the rock formations."

then he bored the hell out of everyone, and then put on an engineer to talk about the dumb craft and not the data from the planet.

how much data is the mission receiving from the Mars crafts? the guy said: "we're bouncing off from MGS @ 100Kbs about 100Mbs of data, and we're getting more bandwidth by getting other ortbial sattelites to work in coordination with the crafts thus increasing the efficiency"

that's a lot of data, and all you get to see are dumb pictures. not always in color, and not always panoramic.


reply posted on 8-1-2004 @ 06:48 AM by Seapeople
Originally posted by bryn
Just a quikie to get some feel forwhat you guys think..


you here a lot of conspiracy theories mention that technologically we are really 30 -40 years ahead of where we are now and that space programmes and such like are simply there to fool the public.... to hide what is really going on.

any views folks???? I would be gutted if we ever found out that it was true


There is definitely technology ahead of what "we" know. I guess it could be looked at like this. I don't understand all technology. So I dont know it. The average person couldnt build a stealth bomber. Most people couldnt build a television I would predict (I couldn't, but maybe im wrong).

After saying that, I do think people believe that the government is capable of things that it is not. It is clear that there are secret projects that the military works on and keeps secret to the best of their ability. It is also clear that military technology is not the only technology. The people who develop this military technology often turn out to be civilians. In other words, us "commoners" are just as intelligent as the people in our government. We have the same capability of schooling. The same potential in our minds.

I dont believe that the government technolgy is 30-40 years ahead of us. It may be ahead of us in a military standpoint, or "national security" standpoint, but that doesn't mean it's ahead of business and private motivations. The military has different objectives. The NSA has different objectives.

We have our own needs as people. So we go seek out that toaster that can hold a WHOLE BAGEL! Or the tennis shoes that have springs in the souls so we can jump an inch higher. I mean...look at the rubik's cube, or the slinky. Thats technology for the rest of us!


reply posted on 27-6-2004 @ 09:07 AM by Ischyros
Personally, I think NASA is just a sideshow. Either the U.S. already had a space program in the late 40's, and NASA was started just to calm the average American down about the Soviets going into space, or the Air Force simply took over the program once the astronauts started finding peculiar things on the Moon. Seeing as how the UFO sightings became more frequent (or at least more widely reported) around 1947 with the Roswell incident, I'm leaning towards America already having a space program before the Russians. Regardless, I'm fairly certain that the military is in actually charge of space exploration.

Btw, in Hebrew, nasa means "to bear, carry, lift up; forgive; to be forgiven, honred, carried; to be carried off, lifted up; to cause to carry, to bring; to exalt oneself, lift up oneself (Strong's Concordance reference #5375). Kind of interesting, especially considering that space might be identified as "the second heaven" according to Biblical cosmology (the sky/atmosphere being the first and paradise/God's domain being the third). In Isaiah 14:14, Satan says, "14:14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."

Notice the title for God used in KJV Isaiah 57:15, "For thus saith the high and lofty [nasa] One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones. "


reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 07:41 AM by Moley
I know it's old news, but I wanted to ask what's the general consensus on the alleged quotes from Neil Armstrong regarding the alien spacecraft already on the moon when Apollo 11 landed ? and that's why we never went back there ?

www.ufoarea.com...

I've seen it quoted many times and I would normally ignore such statements but when a guy like Neil Armstrong says something I'm inclined to take notice. Does anyone know if he has since confirmed or denied it?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Old Forgotten Bunker?
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags