It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: edsinger
The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change - and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: edsinger
No whom is talking out of their pie hole?
You, since that giant world salad was basically you agreeing with what I posted as there was zero refutation of what I said on any of my points.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: edsinger
Nah, it will still be blamed on the United States for the most part even though China has now taken the lead in CO2 emissions.
Has now? The passed us in 2005 and basically double now.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: edsinger
The mud at the bottom of B.C. fjords reveals that solar output drives climate change - and that we should prepare now for dangerous global cooling
Actually solar output doesn't... Since like 1870 solar output has affected temperatures by .01% at any given time.
originally posted by: EvilAxis
The link in the OP is dead.
originally posted by: edsinger
You really believe this?
Explain the olives in Germany in the 1500's. It is that big ball in the sky, we are but pissing on a forest fire with mans contributions.
Not a huge change here.
yearly averages going from 1365.5 Watt per square meter at solar minimum, up to of 1366.6 at maximum.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: AndyMayhew
That's what happens before the temps drop. The whole of the USA is getting really mild temperatures, then in a couple of days the polar vortex will freeze all that wet tropical air into snow. By the end of next week you will be wondering what the # happened. Then it will be rinse and repeat until the ice is a mile high, that's what happens. I don't want to be a party pooper but take precautions.
originally posted by: edsinger
Go back and read it again, I did not agree with what you said.
You said that I was implying that residential rates were less than commercial rates.
originally posted by: edsinger
Believe me, no one was talking about a coming ice age in 2007.