If you're looking for ideas how to coordinate a lot of people to get a rapid response, I'd suggest a system that pings a persons cellphone/PDA
when/if they're in the area of a recently reported UFO.
The first problem to deal with is getting people to opt-in. How is this solved? Simple, do what businesses do, market it!
With iPhones coming out the system could easily be designed to "push" an alert to the users phone. The "Wow" part would come in the form of an
applet that maps the alert through to Google Earth, immediately pin-pointing the persons location and showing the quickest path to the UFO. Somewhat
similar to
ufomaps.com
Once the UFO-tracker starts to make waves a bigger problem will emerge - pranksters and con men. The best way I can think to deal with this is filter
by sheer number of submissions. If there's a situation like the
December 31, 1982 Hudson Valley sighting, with
100's of people witnessing the event, the volume of unique users all reporting from the same location would act as a barometer of the truthfulness of
each of the individual reports.
Another obvious mechanism that would help validate the authenticity of a report -
have the person take a snapshot of the UFO with their 2.0
megapixel iPhone camera!
Of course standard "trust" measures could also be employed. Perhaps implementing a system where a person submits themselves to a web service that
aggregates "karma" across numerous websites. So if the person has a Slashdot account they could log in through the "karma-rater" and it would
measure number of posts and the persons overall rating. You might ask, what if the person doesn't bother? Well then that's karma against them.
If the person wants to be taken seriously they should have to identify themselves in some manner where their integrity is on the line, even if it is
only in some small virtual way.
On the other hand why not use the carrot as well the stick? I say reward first responders when an audience corroborates the event. This is tricky
though. How do outsiders know that the people aren't acting in concert to defraud the system?
There are a lot of half-measures that could be taken, but all of them ultimately fail to establish trust. The best way I can think to do this is to
use a semi-trusted third party, don't laugh,
professional reporters. If a NY times writer corroborates a sighting, he's putting a lot more on
the line then Billy Bob the farmer. It's still abusable, yes, but if the reward is small enough, say a $1000 bucks, the NY Times writer isn't going
to potentially sacrifice his career and reputation on what in the grand scheme of things amounts to nothing.
This system actually works for any person of high-public standing. The point is to measure how much an individual has to gain as well as what they
stand to lose. If the person stands to lose more than they gain, it's a good indicator the person is telling the truth. In this instance a panel
could be setup to determine if these variables line-up and then dispense the funds as appropriate.
So to recap, the point is to:
- Make this FUN for the average joe.
Pitch it as an adventure.
Hell even mock the "crazy UFO nutzos." When the phone receives an alert print, "Crazy UFO junkie WizBangTinMan reported a UFO a mile away from your
current location. Do you dare go see the crazy UFO man in his natural habitat?!" Sensationalize it to the point where the average joe gets involved,
perhaps, at first to poke fun, with the hope that the sightings will expose the situation for what it is, something very real. - Establish trust
in every aspect of the system. If the system has chinks people will lose interest, become disillusioned, and move on to the next fad. Think of
this like BitTorrent for UFOs, everyone participates, but for it to work trust has to be transparently obvious.
And,
- Incentivize it!