posted on Jun, 19 2007 @ 08:35 PM
i actually worked on the beta of this system before it was released, but was under a non-disclosure agreement so I couldn't tell anyone until a few
weeks ago!
The main difference between this table and others from MIT, and other places, is that the MIT ones (and some out now, like the Lemur for audio) are
true touchscreen, while this works using a system of cameras and infrared tags, mostly because touchscreens are more expensive, and easier to damage -
compared to replacing a glass table, projector, or camera it makes more sense for items intended for use by the masses to be designed with that in
mind.
Originally posted by hoochymama
I think Microsoft Bought this tech as I have seen it before a couple years ago. I really despise Microsoft as I believe most of the tech they say
they invented is actually bought from another company or persons.
Plus, there Operating System is the worst ever.
fair enough - i'm no microsoft fanboy either, although I certainly prefer windows over mac, and ultimately microsoft over apple. Microsoft does buy
other companies' software and hardware, and rebrands it. of course, that is what microsoft was founded on! however, I brought this up when we first
met the team, specifically that I had seen this technology years ago - what they were doing that was different.
The response was simple, and made sense. They replied with another question: What other company has the resources, finance, and reach as microsoft,
to take this technology from esoteric / geeks only, to the mainstream?
You have to admit, it's a great point. While they may not be the absolute best company in the world, they are certainly in the position to
standardize just about any technology they want, so that's what they are doing. I don't see that as a bad thing by any means - it will encourage
others to make similar systems, but open source and scaled down for individuals - as these tables are being designed for hotels, theme parks, large
places.