fakkkkkkkkkkkke, but hey maybe one day there will actually be something real in the UFO forum.

Might be viral marketing from the upcomming Transformer movie!

Heh...

To me the structures does tend to look like ISS or a sattelite. Different sattelites would also explain the different pictures.

Originally posted by mnmcandiez
fakkkkkkkkkkkke, but hey maybe one day there will actually be something real in the UFO forum.

You are right, you convinced me it is fake by your excelent explanation to what is fake about it and what it is!

Originally posted by Thain Esh Kelch
To me the structures does tend to look like ISS or a sattelite. Different sattelites would also explain the different pictures.

That idea i had to, no idea what satelites they are though.

[edit on 14/6/2007 by Cygnific]

Is it possible that the anomalies are some kind of lens flare? I admit I know very little about telescopes and general astronomy but it seems that each "ship" has the same sort of pattern of perpendicular lines and (imo) repeating layered patterns which I think would be consistent with the multiple layers of lenses.

It also seems that they have a refracted quality, the feathering of the edges, the lack of definition etc. I would think that since he can take such detailed shots of the moon that an object thats closer than the moon would have equal or better detail upon magnification.

I do find it interesting that his Moon Structure looks a lot like John Lear's and the one reflected in the helmet on that Apollo photo. I'll keep watching for more developments but thats my two cents.

strange pics. Good luck debunking/finding more info/proving this one.

Ummm... I agree that the second one is 100% a star destroyer. The bottom left pic (on second pic) is clear enough to tell.

Also go to the second page, first image.

Now look at the bottom left white ship. It looks like a few frames of an X-Wing from star wars blurred together. There's always "x's" and the guns pointing forward on each length.

Either we have a galaxy quest situation (historical documents!) or this guys a jerk hoaxer, imo.

I remember a John Lenard from middle school years ago.

He used to get caught licking underwear ads in magazines at the school library.

[edit on 14-6-2007 by jbondo]

So far no reasonable debunking theories. A few "it's fake" posts with zero support but that's par for the course. I wish somebody that can analyze photo's would step forward and give an opinion. If the vertical photo that I posted earlier is a satellite please show me a similar picture. I've been looking and so far nothing close IMO.

The ISS lost power early this morning and the orbit was decaying. The computers shutoff. The ISS had to use thrusters to maintain orbit. Also, remember that the space shuttle had launched recently. Furthermore, there are so many old satelites and spacejunk to consider before we could call this thing a supercrusier.

these picture are very interesting but they are far to blurry for anyone to have a reasonable explanation for them.. IMO

they could be anything.. hopefully this isn't another hoax though

Ok, i just saw the dates on the photos, I believe that was before the launch of Atlantis. Sorry

If a telescope can get such a closeup of structures on the moon, then why cant they get better pictures of the shard, cube and other anomolies that we have all seen in those old fuzzy black and white photos.

What bothers me is that for an 'astronomer' he has zero info about what equipment was used (except the name of the telescope) what coordinates he took the photo's from or even the crater where the 'object' is shown not being named. And after seeing the Interstellar movie preview it has remarkable same graphic translucence of the 'crafts'

Man-this is an awesome thread! Even if these images turn out to have mundane explanations, this type of stuff is really fun to explore, and for now it is truly a mystery and exciting to see!

Flagged.