Originally posted by mister.old.school
Now, as history has shown us with every item that is believed to be a conspiracy (both exposed and theorized), the "official story" is typically
"just enough." It contains just enough facts, just enough conclusions, just enough data, and just enough official commentary to placate the general
public. Similarly, by design, such stories also contain certain holes and errors that are designed to lead "crazy conspiracy theorists"
intentionally down paths that lead to confusion and stigmatization.
I completely agree with what you've just said. Having said that, all we have in terms of real evidence for Shanksville is fragments of supposed
flight 93.. an engine part some
2000 feetaway from the crater, and nothing to substantiate that a plane crashed into a 30ft crater. No plane.
No bodies. The plane was either shot out the air.. as Rumsfeld hinted to all the awaiting theorists, to satisfy their curiosity.. or there was no
Flight 93 to begin with. There may well have been a plane in the vicinity, and i think that is more than highly likely, but it certainly was NOT
Flight 93.
The damage sustained to the ground;
I ask you, please locate me some plane in the above two pictures.
The damage is more that of some air dropped munition, spraying forward in a blast radius, and igniting trees in the vicinity, which are not well shown
in the pictures, apart from this aerial one.
This was taken September 12th. Bear that in mind please.;
This photo claims to show the explosion plume from the crash. It is has been stated that it is a fraud right here on ATS;
So. If you concede that you think a plane was shot out of the air, you must try and explain the crater itself and the engine part 2000ft away when
there was no wind due to the fraud photo clearly showing no wind on the smoke plume! Witness testimony is unreliable unless it actually fits with
given visual evidence.
A picture is worth a thousand words.