Forgive me, piacenza, but haven't we addressed this more than once elsewhere; and isn't it the case that, when asked for better quality images or when offered potential explanations, the whole debate comes crashing to a halt. The same will happen here. Why repeat the process in a new thread?

I am reading lately a lot of posts where people are explaining how it is possible for a plane to go through the WTC (maybe with a little bump here and there).
Now if they feel like debunking the NIST presentation I would be very happy. This is an important issue that needs to be looked at one more time IMO. If the Mods feel like it’s not worth a separate thread please cancel the post.
Everything has been covered over and over and over again so should we stop posting all at once?

Its just kind to hard to believe that the nose cone which is made of graphite composte and the rest of the cockpit which is mostly made of aluminum would have made it through the steel beams intact.

Just like the nose of the plane at the Pentagon would not have made it intact past the first wall, let alone the collums and interior walls.



[edit on 9-6-2007 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by snoopy
Can you quote the part where it says the plane couldn't have gone all the way through the building?

And as to how someone asked, it's about speed. Even if something is light weight, if you give it enough speed, it will penetrate anything. In a tornado a poker card can slice through wood. Plus while there are steel beams in the WTC, that's just the supports. The majority of the building is air. Unlike the pentagon where on matter what the nosecone is going through solid concrete.

Well no its not all about speed. Its what its made of also that going to effect how far it goes into building. A graphite composite nose cone is not going to stay intact after hitting the first set of steel beams. At the Pentagon their is no way the nose punched through the reinforced wall and kept going through the collums and interior walls.

[edit on 10-6-2007 by ULTIMA1]

Anything at a high enough speed will go through steel. But what makes you think it hit steel beams?

First of all we don't know which part of the plane came out the other side. It could be the engine, in fact the engine on a b-25 went through the Empire State Building in a very similar manner travelling at much slower speed.

The video evidence is *INCONCLUSIVE* due to the fact it is not the best quality. So what we have is a piece of the plane. Now a part of the engine was found, so it could be the engine.

But we can only speculate at this point.

Originally posted by snoopy
But what makes you think it hit steel beams?

Because their are steel beams just feet apart on the exterior and interior of the buildings.

Is it me...or are the same 4-5 guys making the same threads leading to the same "NO PLANES" theory. I thought the mods were taking control of this!

Topic:
» 9/11 Conspiracies » Did the plane go through the building? Presentation provided. » Post Reply

I've yet to see Any discussion of "plane - no plane" in this thread. ???

"Did the plane go through the building?"

Please keep the responses focused on the topic of discussion.

Thank you.