It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Link
Although there is no reliable information about the PAK-FA's specifications yet, it is known from interviews with people in the Russian Air Force that it will be stealthy, have the ability to supercruise, be outfitted with the next generation of air-to-air, air-to-surface, and air-to-ship missiles, and incorporate an AESA radar. It will be powered by the AL-41F engine or an advanced derivative of it. Reports indicate that it will be slightly larger than the MiG-29 but not as large as the Su-27. Analysts are predicting a maximum speed close to Mach 2.83 (3,255 km/h); they will see how this will come up.
Your still living in 1995-98, wake up Russia's economy has changed for the better, plus it was U.S. Banks and Companies that got Russia's economy messed up.
Originally posted by paraphi
Yet more speculation. Can't wait until a new "artists impression" is produced! I just love the artists impressions, arn't they good.
Russia can hardly afford the armed services it has. I doubt it has the cash to invest in such a long-lead-time and sophisticated project as this. Oh, yes Russia may be cash rich at the moment, but the domestic is to modernise their (frankly) backward economy etc...
Am I the only person who feels this way?
Regards
Originally posted by YASKY
Your still living in 1995-98, wake up Russia's economy has changed for the better, plus it was U.S. Banks and Companies that got Russia's economy messed up.
All we hear is speculation that Russia is / will / may develop a fifth generation fighter. Nothing concrete.
My problem is that an artists impression plus an (un-named expert) speculating that the aircraft will probably have wings, or go this fast, or fly backwards is just rubbish. There's no substance.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
It has been talked about for a long time and its still being talked about hence the amount of people that think that the plane will never happen. I wouldn't go as far as to say that but more then a CG rendering is needed in order for anyone to start even talking about the plane as a threat to the F-22.
From WikipediaThe Novosibirsk Chkalov Aviation Production Association (NAPO) has begun construction of the fifth generation multirole fighter. This work is being performed at Komsomol’sk-on-Amur together with the aircraft plant at Komsomol’sk-on-Amur, the enterprise’s general director, Fedor Zhdanov, reported today during a visit to NAPO by Novosibirsk Oblast’ governor Viktor Tolokonskiy.
“Final assembly will take place at Komsomol’sk-on-Amur, and we will be carrying out assembly of the fore body of this airplane,” Zhdanov specified. The fifth generation fighter which will replace the MiG-29 and Su-27 airplanes of the previous generation, was developed by the Sukhoi design bureau
In mid May "Saturn", the head developer of the PAK FA’s engine, declared in the media that it suspends the work on the fifth generation engine allegedly due to the absence of the corresponding contract with the MoD, but in fact due to the lack of financing.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Russia is developing PAK-FA. Russia does intend to use it to replace their Su-27 and MiG-29 fleet. Russia has been planning this project for quite some time. Russia has undertaken several precursors to PAK-FA in order to make sure that they are capable of producing a fifth-generation aircraft with stealth features. Examples include Su-47 and Mikoyan 1.44. I find it difficult to doubt that they are developing PAK-FA considering that they say they are doing so, as well as the quality of the testbeds they have been putting out in the last period of time.
Originally posted by paraphi
(a) The PAK-FA project has come and gone in the past.
(b) New aircraft are expensive and I doubt Russia could afford to develop a fifth generation competitor or equal to the F22/35. Even the US has trouble justifying the cost of these development projects. We are talking billions of USD at a time when the Russian air force can hardly afford to train its aircrew, (record low flight hours logged) and a third of the existing stock of aircraft in an apparent un-operational state.
(c) The output of PAK-FA (so far) is a selection of interesting one-offs and latterly a host of artist impressions which may (or may not) have legitimate connection with current work. There is a vast array of conflicting “facts” in the public domain, a lot of speculation and no real evidence or substance. Some of the conflicting “bits” I have seen revolve around the weight of aircraft (crucial); the degree of stealth; the participation of India; whether PAK-FA is or was part of the recently shelved lightweight fighter project (LFI); the engines; first flight 2007, 2008 etc., etc…
Originally posted by Darkpr0
As for the aircrews, why should they be constantly put into aircraft that are expensive to maintain? They aren't in a state of war, and aren't attempting to blow anyone up like the American forces currently are. In the event that war broke out between them and another nation it is quite likely that the entire air force would not be required for operations, and if the enemy was so powerful that it did necessitate complete mobilization then funds would be allocated and training would become daily. The funds that are required to keep aircraft continuously running for training are better placed elsewhere since the need for the training isn't really present.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
This attitude just astounds me. How can you POSSIBLY fight ANY kind of war if you don't train? The reason the US and just about every other country puts so many hours into training isn't "because they're trying to blow someone up", it's so that when they DO have to fight, they don't get pilots up there trying to learn how to fly their planes while trying to survive a fight.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
This is similar to the YF-22/YF-23 competition, but (IMHO) an improved version. While America decided to take the F-22 and start working on it for a production version, it sparked a lot of arguments over "should have". People are still saying the Black Widow would have been better. I personally don't care. But what if you were to unite the two companies to produce a Raptor/Widow hybrid that combines aspects of both to create an aircraft that surpasses both of them?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As for the old vs new debate, please tell me how, in WWII the Finnish Air Force (I BELIEVE it was them) was able to take their Brewster Buffalo aircraft (one of the worst "fighters" EVER) and bring down so many top of the line German aircraft in them? Because they used them properly to do it. You can have an old plane, or a crappy plane, and still win a dogfight if you use the plane properly.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As for the old vs new debate, please tell me how, in WWII the Finnish Air Force (I BELIEVE it was them) was able to take their Brewster Buffalo aircraft (one of the worst "fighters" EVER) and bring down so many top of the line German aircraft in them? Because they used them properly to do it. You can have an old plane, or a crappy plane, and still win a dogfight if you use the plane properly.