Originally posted by roucka007
The
Cassini Project is not fiction, as NASA has spacecraft orbiting the
gaseous planet loaded with 72 pounds of plutonium ready to rock the
heavens, rearrange the solar system and destroy planet Earth.

Nope...Cassini isn't fiction. It's very real, and very ambitious. However, it's not a planet-killer, or a solar system rearranger. Somebody's
already losing touch with reality, here.
The link is busted. I think that's because somebody left a 't' out of the link...they typed in "http" (HyperText Transfer Protocol), but they
needed to use 'htttp' (HyperText Temporal Transfer Protocol) to link to a site two years into the future!
While
the enemy within has Americans looking for nuclear and biological
attacks coming from Al Qaeda, the real attack may really be coming from
a spacecraft now orbiting Saturn.
As out of this world as it
sounds, The New World Order NASA minions are "creating a new star using
a plutonium bomb" with plans to hit Saturn with such force that the
heavens will be rocked and the earth will be showered with radiation,
wiping out life as we know it with one wild, magnanimous scientific
brush stroke.

Wow! Bad science and bad grammar all in one tidy package! First, the science. How, exactly, is a 72lb mass of plutonium supposed to initiate the
transformation of Saturn into a star? If Saturn had sufficient mass to sustain a fusion reaction, it would already be a star, and adding 72lbs of mass
to the planet won't make a measurable distance.
Even if the plutonium were configured as one (or more) nuclear devices, the energy released wouldn't be anywhere near enough to initiate a
planet-wide fusion reaction. 72lbs of plutonium would make 10-12 21Kt devices, for a total yield of 210 - 254Kt. That sounds like a lot of bang, but
comet Shoemaker-Levy hit Jupiter with 21 major impacts, at least one of which was equal to ~6,000,000,000kt, and Jupiter failed to ignite. I don't
think that Cassini has the energy budget to get the job done.
Now the grammar. What, exactly, is a 'wild, magnanimous, scientific brush stroke'? One with lots of paint on it?
Magnanimous, definition of
There's probably another word that somebody intended to use. Too bad the Illuminati Mind Control Rays zapped him before he could find it!
Sound outlandish and impossible? Sound like a science fiction movie?

As a matter of fact, it does...2010, by Arthur Clarke, to be exact.
But
nothing is out of the realm of possibility for the evil Illuminati
since their global plan, documented in numerous writings, include
wiping out approximately 80 per cent of the world's population.
And
what better way to create a rapture or great chastisement then by
blowing up a gas giant like Saturn with 72 pounds of plutonium, create
a new star and then heat-up the new star's moon, Titan, making it
habitable by 2033 for guess who?
Yes, if you guessed Lucifer's followers, the Illuminati, then you guessed right.

Nothing is impossible for the Illuminati, except silencing all of the leaks that keep putting their nefarious plans out on the internet for alll to
see. Violating the laws of physics isn't a problem, I'm sure.
And
if you wondered if the project really exists then you guessed right
again since it exists under the name of NASA's Cassini Project. To make
matters even worse, the name Cassini is taken from a Jesuit-trained
Italian astronomer named Cassini, giving researchers and historians
another clue as to who really are the spiritual controllers of the New
World Order.

Right. Naming it "Cassini" was a secret sign that the Jesuits were involved. It had nothing to do with the fact that Giovanni Domenico Cassini
discovered several of Saturn's moons, and made a study of the ring structures. I guess Christiann Huygens was a Jesuit as well? After all, his name
is on the probe right alongside Cassini's.
Further, the project has been named the Lucifer
Project since the intent of those behind it is to name the new star
created from the plutonium explosion on Saturn, Lucifer. Also, the full article at www.rinf.com without an author's name attached asked, "Why
is creating a star from one of our gaseous giants commonly known as the
"Lucifer Project"?

Since this part is a
direct rip-off from Arthur Clarke's "2010" (and an unattributed one at that), I'll use his explanation. "Lucifer"
means "Light Bringer", and the second sun pretty well did away with night in the conventional sense. It was named "Lucifer", not because of any
connection to the devil, but because it brought new light to the darkness (which was Old Nick's job, before it went to his head, if you'll
remember).
Sorry....the premise is ridiculous, the motives aren't valid, and the plot is a dumbed-down ripoff of one of the great science fiction authors of the
last few decads. This one gets the official Brother Stormhammer
FOUR thumbs down (two of mine, and two from my macaw! Thanks for the assist,
Dante!)
[edit on 10-6-2007 by Brother Stormhammer]