New Video: september clues exposes 911 TV Fakery, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 12:32 PM by mister.old.school
Originally posted by piacenza


I believe you are basing that image composite, at least in part, on this digital video capture on StillDiggin's website --

(Please correct me if I am wrong)

The composite appears to have applied quite a bit of blur effect to achieve the desired shape in order to fit the presupposed theory. As we know, we cannot place too much reliance on the accuracy of compressed digital video. The very act of compression introduces mosaic artifacts to varying degrees, dependent on the method used for compression (and anything uploaded to YouTube or any other similar service is compressed, yet again).

But let's examine this image in closer detail. Here is a 600% zoom on the are in question. As we can see, this shape is surrounded by a great deal of compression artifacts and pixelization. However, after zooming in on the unfiltered shape (no blur), we can see that the pixels do indeed imply more of a ejected smoke plume, than fuselage --

Granted, the shape is fuselage-like, but but this source imagery is not enough.

Again I stress the need for diligent reliance on high-quality source material as the basis for theories that result in claims as fantastic as presented in these threads.


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 01:19 PM by talisman
Here is a picture of a 767





compare with....






Question is, and I have asked this before.

What part of the plane is that? To me I don't think it is exactly the Fuselage but that doesn't leave us with much else.

recall the POD theory




It could very well be the underside. But nothing is conclusive. Before jumping to any conclusions one could assume disguised plane rather then CGI.



[edit on 7-6-2007 by talisman]


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 01:37 PM by mister.old.school
Originally posted by piacenza
I would like you to watch this video where you get a much better view of the nose cone:
youtube.com...


So then let's do our best to examine yet another multiple-generation compressed video.

As we can see, there are so many compression artifacts, we cannot be sure what is represented.


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 01:51 PM by estar
ok chillout www.livevideo.com... heres a link to all 4 of the video's, the 3rd one really caught my eye and the backdrop change made my jaw drop. I suggest everyone takes a look at all 4 on the link i provided. Something's not right in any of the video clips they contradict each other when shown with a close eye as shownin these clips. I never believed in the no plane theory, but im open to it now after seeing all 4 parts. Great movie, lets stop the pickering and investigate it further!
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 10 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 12 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 7 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 185 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 101 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 69 replies