If someone was to click on your link, what they would find is a claim, "all the videos are fake" then it shows a dark looking plane in a video and compares it to a different video that shows a lighter looking plane.
To start with, actual, real researchers can tell you where that was taken and it is around two and a half miles away, so there would be a diminishment of light, just because of the distance. The "light plane" was taken right on the perimeter of the World Trade Center (meaning very close). Another thing is that when the plane was more distant from the crash site, it was flying in the shadow of that big plume of smoke coming from the earlier plane crash. The "light plane" video is where this Oct.C.'s video even admits the plane becomes lighter, in the "dark plane" video. When it is right up against the second WTC tower, the plane has passed out from under the shadow of the smoke and has more light. Plus, any of the second crash videos show that the right wind tips higher before hitting, thus giving more light to the underside of the plane.
The whole Oct. C's video is just something to discredit and make a straw man out of anyone who questions the "official" version. I personally am totally convinced there was a real plane but I also believe that the tower was simultaneously hit by at least one other object, and if there is video fakery, then it is meant to hide the fact that there were multiple hits on each tower, not to make a plane look like it is there, when there wasn't. That's just silly.
edit on 12-12-2010 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)