Originally posted by bsregistration
The Nose-Out Glitch was computer graphics and has been thouroughly analyzed and explained in the video on this thread, at 911logic.blogspot.com...
in the articles "Pinochio Nose Out Gitch" and "Screwing up the cover-up of the cover-up of the Screw Up" by Still Diggin.
Thank you. Unfortunately, my experience causes me to reject those explanations, as there is no evidence that the analysis has been composed by an
imaging professional.
Here is the link for those who are curious:
911logic.blogspot.com...
While there has been a great deal of effort by "StillDiggin" to use the materials to prove his "CGI" supposition. No effort has been made to prove
that that the "nose-out" item is simply not a horizontal column of the explosion being squeezed through a broken window.
In fact, the photos he's using easily support the notion that this artifact is indeed first the dust/debris-cloud of what is likely a very
high-pressure event inside the building as a window blows out under pressure -- and then is followed by the flame and fireball of the explosion.
I would sincerely like to discover damning evidence that enables the pointing of fingers. But my belief is that this material is far from it and has
been assembled with laughably poor (if not prolific) investigative effort.
And unfortunately, and more succinctly, I believe this material is part of an organized effort to cast dispersions on 9/11 conspiracy theorists. This
is my opinion of the material, and does not mean I feel you are part of it, but may have been fooled (as many have).
Secondly, there is no evidence, zero, ziltch, nada. The Peter Jennings video is a prime example; it is
pure speculation. How do you explain posting speculation as fact? In five threads, no less? 
