Ban Cigarettes and Alcohol, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 07:35 PM by stumason
reply to post by TheRedneck



Talk about an OTT response.

This was just an opinion from one board member in the UK, it's not even on the cards as a possible banning, let alone ever going to happen. Calm down, you might get your patriotic panties in a twist!


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 11:11 PM by TheRedneck
reply to post by stumason

And my reply was the opinion of another member.

I tend to get defensive whenever I hear someone talk about, much less openly endorse, limits on personal freedom for no sound reason. Even more worrisome is the fact that you would consider my stance to be somehow extreme.

I'm glad I don't live in the UK. I'd rather be free.

TheRedneck



reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 11:50 PM by xstealth
*snip*

Mod Edit: Please Review the Following Link: Courtesy Is Mandatory

I read the first paragraph and first sentence of the second and quit.

Why the hell would you give the government authority to ban our choices, or rights?

So what if they cause cancer, so do hair dryers, cell phones, microwaves, the sun, and the list is endless.

Let us enjoy what we want until we die, don't ever let anyone ban a choice. If you don't like it, don't do it. Get our of our business.

You deliver the perfect response for a communist, get real. Now im going to grab a beer and have a smoke.

[edit on 17/10/08 by Jbird]


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 06:03 PM by ETL71
Wow. I find it odd that everyone does not remember - at least from school - Prohibition in the USA from 1920 to 1933 in the United States. And the problem with bootlegging [rum-running]. Other countries tried it around the same time as well. It gave rise to organized crime.

Check out the following link to Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org...

Banning any potentially addictive substance, just creates business for drug dealers and drug lords. Banning Alcohol and Tobacco would just turn ordinary citizens living in Canada and Mexico into drug dealers as USA citizens flock into these countries for their fix.

Of course the big money would be in to smuggling these items into the USA. They think they have border problems now - it would escalate far beyond what it is now, and turn the USA into a walled police state.

If anything, more drugs should be legalized and the government control them, and spend more money on educating the youth on the problems of addiction. At least one place in Canada - Vancouver B.C. has a shoot-up site. Where free needles are provided, a safe place to shoot up, drugs, and encouragement to get off of the drugs are all provided. The benefits are it reduced the crime rate around the neighborhood, and the streets are cleaner.

FYI - I drink sometimes, but that is about it. And rarely have more than two drinks.


reply posted on 28-3-2010 @ 10:56 AM by stephenwephentephen
reply to post by bodrul



You feeling okay? :|

Ban cigarettes and alcohol!? why take away someones simple pleasures in life, yes smoking is bad for your health, but it's not as bad as say morbid obesity, so hell why there at it why not ban mcdonalds, kfc, and every other fast food chain.
fair play i understand if in a public place it can effect other people, and there has been measures took on that, but taking away something like that, just no, sorry i have to strongley disagree.


reply posted on 28-3-2010 @ 11:00 AM by stephenwephentephen
reply to post by ETL71



Haha i remember my year 11 History project on this, Al Capone springs to mind, haha,
It's safe to say the banning of any of lifes more simple pleasures will always result in a nice bit of public revolt! x


reply posted on 28-3-2010 @ 11:02 AM by stephenwephentephen
reply to post by TheRedneck



And your post gets a shiny star from me, it's a horrible idea, lets just ban everything, heck we may aswell all just dress exactly the same and earn the same wage etc... sound familiar


reply posted on 28-3-2010 @ 11:20 AM by Son of Will
reply to post by chissler



Anyone who chooses to operate an automobile after consuming alcohol should be stigmatized as a murderer, rapist, or even child pedophile. But the substance itself should be legal.


Wow. Comparing drunk drivers to child rapists? That's the most ridiculous comparison I've heard in a LONG time. Yes, drinking increases the chances of getting into an accident. But it's not like the moment you take a sip from a beer, you'll automatically go crashing into the side of an elementary school. I've probably driven while slightly-moderately drunk over 200 times. Why? Three reasons.

1) I don't drink to excess. There's a LARGE difference between getting roaring, stumbling, stuttering drunk, and getting a bit tipsy, warm, and that "padded head" feeling.
2) I'm an awesome driver. Over 100,000 miles driven and never once been in an accident. Not to brag, I've just done it a lot, for work mostly. I don't lose control of my brain or my car.
3) It's fun. Sorry to burst any bubbles out there.


Oh, and I smoke cigarettes while I do it! Feel free to judge or condemn me, I really don't care because I know my body a lot better than anyone else.


reply posted on 28-3-2010 @ 11:54 AM by jumpingbeanz
reply to post by expat2368



yeah completely agree!,,
just don't take away my chocolate as women will turn like nothing you have ever seen before
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The 51st State
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags
America before the republican takeover
  Posted 16 days ago with 1 member flags
Now Europe is Going What is the UK\'s Plan
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags