Why did the hijackings work when the terrorist only had box cutters and they never learned to fly planes? Idiots. Yes they did learn to fly planes. At 10: 18 they say hijackers had no experience, and jets pilots need jetliner training to be able to fly, but the thing is they did learn how to fly. They took months of flight lessons from local schools. They trained for months, never learned to take off or land..simply fly. There are videos of their old flight instructors recalling the hijackers training. There is records of them learning to fly planes for many months before the attacks. They also trained on flight simulators as well as killed pigs back in terrorist training camp, to learn how to cut thoughts. The idea that they had "no training" is fiction. Boxcutters worked for many reasons. Boxcutters are a dangerous weapon. It's not like anyone on the plane had a gun. At 10:30 the video claims a box cutter cant cut a suitcase? BS. A box cutter can mangle a suitcase, or human in seconds. Boxcutters are VERY sharp because THEY ARE USED TO CUT BOXES. Also the video makes an assumption like anyone in the passengers shoes would have done better. When was the last time you were hijacked on a plane? Robbed at gunpoint? Held by men who said they had a bomb and would kill you and your family if you tried to move? Who is anyone to judge the actions of the passengers? This kind of disrespect and second guessing of others should get people hanged.

Why was hijackers passport found on street. Because of natural disaster anomalies. Why can a tornado pick up a tree and leave a mailbox intact in the ground? Why did trinkets like photos, necklaces, earrings, bracelets, ties, makeup, shoes, cell phones, photo IDS, drivers licenses, and all other sorts of little knick knacks appear in the NYC streets? Did the government plant all those items as "evidence" too?

Why did bush say he saw the 1st plane he hit the tower when no media footage was aired till the next day?To get reelected.He never said which plane, 1st or second that he saw. Who knows he could have buttered up some story to make himself look like a powerful leader, for the elections. Again, another quote taken entirely to literally, or completely out of context.

Why no effective military response to the hijackings? You would have rathered them blow up innocent civilians because of suspicion of terrorism? When was the last time BEFORE 911 that you heard about a brutal hijacking. When was the last time planes were hijacked to crash into buildings? The problem with this is you assume everyone had some kind of terrorism manual, and could predict the future. How would the USA look if they shot down a group of civilians on a plane, all because of some suspicions activity. The military didn't' know how to handle this situation, BECUASE IT HAD NEVER OCCURED BEFORE.

Why would islamists do something so harmful to their cause? What? Are you on some kind of illegal drug? The argument that islamist "hurt themselves" by getting usa to invade iraq is BS. How did al quaeda hurt their cause? They've since riled nations like Iran against the united states, and gave hope to people like Hezbolla that their terrorist actions are the right path. Getting USA in an embarrassing 7 year war, toppling our famous landmarks, and dividing the american people was EXACTLY what the terrorist wanted. Islamists won by making usa look weak. The false questions was a lame excuse to show gory pictures of the iraq war, and claim their hate for america. The photos where completely offensive and totally unnecessary. IT just shows you that the 911 Truth movement is not meant to spread truth, but to shock. IT's an excuse for angry teenagers to flip off their parents. IT's an excuse to sell Alex Jones T-shirts and manipulate people through propaganda. 911 truthers are scum and deserved to be wiped from the face of the earth

It's also very funny to see the films conclusion. You will shout in favor of the terrorists and scream, "the islamists were framed!" because every answer to your question is 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. Why did they raise the price at the pumps? "BECAUSE 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB". Why did it rain yesterday instead of clear skies? "BECAUSE 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB" Why did the unicorn get married to the donkey? "BECAUSE 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB". So you see there's no rational debate with truthers, because the truth is that they have made up their minds already.

Lets review. So far this video has, 1: shown human pain and suffering for personal gain. The video had no reason to show all those gory pictures of iraq, it did NOT advance the story. It was thrown in for shock value and was a cheap way to get people to "belive". 2: absolutley disregarded science. It proudly stated that they don't belive 200+ college educated people that wrote the official 9-11 report. IT said their degrees don't matter, because our INTERNET SCIENCE IS BETTER. 3: Offered contradictory evidence. There was a clear picture shown in the movie of a building falling apart due to fire. The entire video is also filled with contradictions, and false assumptions. 4: Offered false evidence. This gets it's own number becuase it's different than a contradiction. It shows alleged video footage of WTC7 being reported as falling down before it did, however there is no TIMESTAMP on the raw footage, and someone made a separate graphic that allegedly tells us the time, and cut+pasted it for a couple seconds before the video. All this adds up to fabricated evidence. 5: Called anyone who doesn't think 9-11 is a conspirocy, crazy. IT basically mocks you if you don't belive into the paraniod dillusional idea that 9-11 was the USA government. So basically if i take the word of 200+ college educated engineers and scientists, over the word of some punk on the internet, then I'M the one whos crazy. 6: sympathized with the terrorists. They said that the muslim terrorists "hurt their cause" and also made the muslims out to be "victims" and "scapegoats". So basically this video is saying that you should just join al quaeda, since there are no terrorists and everyone except USA is guilty. This kind of language would have gotten you condemmed to death for TREASON back in the old days, for what it's worth...

Pathetic. Whoever made this terrible video is an idiot. Just another reason why you shouldn't belive the "truth" movement.

wow, where did you go to school? It looks like some where in the couuntry (or another) they acually have a good working educational system.

Using the pause and type method to avoid forgetting a thought that enters mind. I hope for this not to become a rewrite of Spawwwn's post.

Point 1. The assumption that a college degree magically transfers intelligence is one of the downfalls of our ecconomy. A nice example is one time we had a semi-consciece elderly patient that would thrash about and swing wildly everytime he was moved physically or rolled in a gurney (trolley--UK readers). I was called to deal with him. Observed his actions and applied thumb and index finger to a pressure point everytime we had to move him. The ER doctor asked what I did. Told her I applied accupressure to subdue motion sickness. He was no longer aware of movement and stopped lashing out. It was enough that she researched it and took an instruction class on it. She would ask me questions from time to time and share things she learned and I showed her a few things that would not be taught. My job at the time was security guard.

Question 1. This question does not address foiled plots, the Anthrax mailings and instead would like to imply that the thoughts and actions of one person that was secretive could not be stopped therefore the planning and commuications of an organised terrorist group threat could not. Too recent for the video would be the 3 out of 4 captured plotting the JFK Fuellines, to throw out an example.

Question 2. Interesting that material is covered so quickly like rattling off a shopping list. No CD has ever imploded a building from the top down leaving a solid foundation. The dust cloud is caused by the crumbling collapse of a building in CD as well. In a CD all the structural support is blown allowing for gravity to collapse the building. In a CD great pains are taken to calculate how it will fall to avoid ejecta from damaging nearby buildings. As there was lots of damage to neighboring buildings the CD team would have been pretty incompetent to say the least.

Question 3. Flight 93 was reported as landed in Cleveland, OH. A truck bomb was reported as exploded outside the Capitol building in DC. ABC coverage had no idea what caused the thick black smoke in DC at first. First thoughts were an unknown building a few blocks away from the White House. A news report that the VA Hospital in Dayton, OH was struck due to black smoke visible and loud booms earlier. That smoke was a tire fire and the booms were escort jets breaking the sound barrier to reach Air Force One on the return to DC. Lots of crazy things were reported. WTC7 had been leaning for several hours and many felt it would fall. In the news game first is more important than factual. You can always make a retraction or you can always be last.

Question 4. Many college educated individuals have problems working a cell phone, rebooting a computer when there is a problem, driving a car worth a darn. Surfing myspace pages, texting friends, watching reality shows and nuking a bag of popcorn are hardly scientific studies. Just one of those unscientific guesses but I would think that debris went through the floors in a semi-fluid manner like an avalanche or sand through a hourglass several floors ahead of the crumbling exterior. Hotspots are common after fires. Some retain enough heat to cause the fire department to come back 1-3 days later to put out the fire again. Given the amount of concrete debris in chunks and powders form, the creation of kilns is not out of the realm of possibility holding the heat deep inside the rubble. Could the tower top been pulled back in to the building by that super indestructible core that gets loads of talk? Maybe it was that the back part was still attached (unlike the detacted plane impact that was the fulcrum of the collapse) and pulled the tower tip along with it as it fell? The video/no video arguement is a good example of ignoring evidence to create a fallacy that was just mentioned before. There is video evidence on WTC1 that part of the core stood, the dust cloud does obscure how long it stood. There paragraph as a whole is correct. Editing to create a contradiction is misleading. The repeating of nonsense, no sense, nonsense is an attempt to drive a point, a form of conditioning.

Question 5. Can't say much on the torture part. Neither could the video, very short section. I don't have inside info and neither does the video. Interigation does sometimes require that the will to resist giving information is broken. Parading prisoners on leashes is "torture" to some. Cutting people's heads off with a Kbar is murder. The US doesn't do that but I guess that was outside the scope of the video as it may draw resentment against the wrong target.

Question 6. They were trained to fly. Don't let the complex layout fool you. Key instuments are the yoke, rudder, throttle, altimeter, artifical horizon and compass. The feel is different than a Cessna but with flight time (which they did have) you can learn once you know how to fly. The main pilot for the Pentagon was picked because he was the most experienced and that was the heardest target. John Lear says he could not hit the twin towers, I think I could. I can safely bet neither one of us would want to prove it in a real plane if they were still there.

Question 7. A good question and a fair question. But then again they found earrings, necklaces, driver's licenses and all kinds of stuff on the street. A tornado can drive a 6 foot long 2x4 into a tree and not strip off all the leaves. They say a penny dropped from the Empire State Building can become inbedded in the sidewalk. They also say it will most likely hit the building so many times that the impact would be no different than if it fell 40 feet. They say a paper cup can break you nose in a car crash from the kinetic force of the crash. Who knows for sure what happened.