Nasa baffled by soil properties on mars in latest photo.

wet t-shirt??? was there a contest? wonders if the 6 nipple girl from Vega beat the 3 breast woman from Planet X?

okay....could it be a fossil of some sort of animal life? don't know if those kind of things would survive that long...

Originally posted by Zzub

url]

Looks like mushy soggy sand to me. Kinda like how beach sand gets and feels when its all fine and soggy. Odd tho, will be interesting to see...

Originally posted by ultra_phoenix

Originally posted by SevenZeroOne

Have you guys EVER looked at earth rocks? Obviously if you look hard enough you will see just about anything. I have some pictues of rocks in the distance when I was living in Arizona. I'm sure if I wanted to I could see Tim Allen's foot in one of them.

Found 10...Can anyone find the one I couldn't find? I looked hard! lol


[Edited on 9-1-2004 by CindyPants]

Its rather easy but funny...

I couldn't see the one in the top center, due to my dark monitor....now I don't feel so bad, hehe.....

Did you guys see the one circled in green? I know, my amaizing circling skills have mystified you! Take a look.

Look above the largest circled pic on the right, would that not be another face?

Originally posted by tracer
There is also a face right above the # 8 face that was not circled.

I said that too, back on the last page in post #322256 . It still hasn't been noticed, I guess. (Well, a few have noticed, now)

[Edited on 1-9-2004 by Satyr]

Mud Is Mud!

"It's quite easy to be baffled if you refuse to consider the obvious. "
Ocam's Toothbrush

Originally posted by 10DeadInside10
Looks like mushy soggy sand to me. Kinda like how beach sand gets and feels when its all fine and soggy. Odd tho, will be interesting to see...

That's what I think, but it can't be liquid based, as most of the liquid on mars would have evaporated away into space with the environment. Also, it's too cold for most liquids to remain liquid there.

I really hope they get a good look at this patch, it's fascinating.

just thinking out loud

on earth the metal, element, Mercury is 'fluid'

at room temperature its called QuickSilver.

so, under different conditions (say Mars)

elements might combine (or incubate?) with odd results?


~*~...just wandering.....aum

As I found the 11 faces myself, I guess I'm pretty good. Also, I found a skull and a 12th face. So there are 13 faces.







[Edited on 7-1-2004 by ultra_phoenix]

Ok i was having a look and...

Is that a face on the white tree right above no 7.?

I Think I found another one




sorry for the sloppy outline, I'm using a thumb/trigger mouse

Originally posted by riffraffalunas
just thinking out loud

on earth the metal, element, Mercury is 'fluid'

at room temperature its called QuickSilver.

so, under different conditions (say Mars)

elements might combine (or incubate?) with odd results?

The temperatures on Mars would actualy keep all elemental metals solid. I'd still have to guess its iron powder clumping due to being magnetic. Which is upsetting because this would mean Mars was always dry and had very little water from the begining.

If it is the opposite and a wet substance then it its MUCH more moisture then expected.

remember the cheap magnetic toys where with a magnetic wand you could manipulate the iron fibers
to style the mans hair?...

what if the airbags created a magnetic pull due to static
and if the surface were iron oxide..would it not respond in kind?

www.unitedspacealliance.com...

is this nasa tv?


There doesnt seem to be a live feed from the mars probe. Is there anywhere else i can find it?

thankyou

Yeah, there is another face above the biggest face on the right side of that pic. Hmm, wouldn't that make 12? ( I found all 11 before seeing the circled picture :-D )

Anyways, how can there be mud on the surface of Mars when there is NO surface water? Hmm...

-wD

Originally posted by cyberpilot
remember the cheap magnetic toys where with a magnetic wand you could manipulate the iron fibers
to style the mans hair?...

what if the airbags created a magnetic pull due to static
and if the surface were iron oxide..would it not respond in kind?

~~zz~~
could be...

but, since the Mars 'Crucible' is absent of a magnetosphere, ionospshere& ozone layer...

the iron stones & dust must have originated off-planet

cosmic rays of all types have bombarded Mars for eons
just as solar & galactic debris has... all these odd characteristics ( precieved oddities) are Martian Nature...

One might also consider that nothing in the pictures available....would preclude the Exploded Planet Hypothesis...and revisiting the concept

EXCERPT: And this (EPH) may have been the event that delivered large quantities of water to the inner solar system, most notably MARS ((which may have still been one of Planet V's moons- at the time of the explosion)

go to: www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/eph/ephrevised/ephrevised.asp

www.world-mysteries.com...
(long page, several headings before the EPH at bottom)

www.metaresearch.org...

~v~ pondering, chondritic meteorites, Bode's law, composition of stoney objects on surface...
PSS:: mercury becomes solid around -40 below F ,&,
the ambient temp? on date of Mars photos??
showing what might be a clay or plastic nature / characteristic of soil/rock surface??
--->the unnatural material is not necessarily a mercury amalgum...but could be...if we stretch mr Hoaglands' thoughts that the landing site is in a gully or basin in which copious ammounts of liquid water swept all these seen rocks/stones/artifacts ... then, we could back track and say that the 'polluted with heavy metal waters',
collected in this basin/crater....

just ramblin....oops....the footballs on, need to unwind

enjoy the journey


[Edited on 10-1-2004 by riffraffalunas]

Originally posted by 10DeadInside10

Originally posted by Zzub

url]

REMEMBER THIS THINGY???

"One of the science team members, geologist John Grotzinger of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said the Magic Carpet was intriguing because it showed that the soil in the area wasn't necessarily brittle but was capable of a "plastic sort of deformation." He and fellow geologist Michael Malin acknowledged that the scraping looked like mud in low-resolution imagery. But they insisted that dry, fine-grained soil could exhibit the same quality."

read the rest of the article
www.msnbc.msn.com...







[Edited on 1-12-2004 by worldwatcher]
sorry I kept messing up the link
[Edited on 1-12-2004 by worldwatcher]

[Edited on 1-12-2004 by worldwatcher]

i hope we find signs of some kind of life