PSYOP Stock Footage Shown on 9/11, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 5-6-2007 @ 10:33 AM by apex
Originally posted by bsregistration
OK, here's three sources outlining the source of the moving bridge problem.

killtown.blogspot.com...


I see exactly what I would expect of that bridge really, I can't see what the problem really is about it. As the view point moves, so does the way you see the towers if you look closely, and the bridge being 7.5miles away, the effect is magnified unsurprisingly.


reply posted on 5-6-2007 @ 12:04 PM by mister.old.school
My, what a fuss we have here.

First, let me be clear about one thing that seems to be getting lost. I believe a criminal conspiracy existed to plan and execute the events of 9/11/2001. In addition, I believe an ongoing criminal conspiracy exists to cover up complicity in those events.

Now, "bsregistration", I've staunchly held the belief that you are one of the many online pseudonyms of Nico "Conspiracy Fakery" Haupt. I arrived at this assumption from rather extensive in-person and online direct experience with Haupt, and your actions and topics here have been identical to Haupt's career with 9/11 conspiracy topics. I apologize that my identity accusation offended you. While I'm uncertain as to your true identity, I'll no longer imply you are Haupt, but I will reserve the right to refer to some of your topics as having originated with Nico "Conspiracy Fakery" Haupt.

The reason for my intense dislike for the theories you present here (not you) lies in my staunch belief that part of the cover up conspiracy includes the distribution of absurdly impossible or inaccurate contrivances as "9/11 conspiracies". While I may viciously attack the ideas you bring here, it is done so out of a passion to know what really happened and who is responsible. This does not mean I believe those who spread such contrived theories are agents of the conspiracy, but that they have been fooled and are unwittingly playing a part in the viral marketing of disinformation.


reply posted on 5-6-2007 @ 12:16 PM by apex
Originally posted by bsregistration
So you're telling me it couldn't even crack the sidewalk, but it blew up the World Trade Center?

You're showing me a photograph of *what exactly* under a constuction canopy?

Maybe YOU should go to wikipedia and check out what an engine for UA175 looks like. Here's a hint: it's not the size of a trash can.


Here's a couple of hints for you. There are not just the two obvious engines on a 767, there is a auxiliary power unit engine as well, at the back, which is considerably smaller than those used in the main engines. As well as that, while engines are heavy and difficult to destroy, they won't go through a building without being destroyed themselves, and it is possible that is a part of one of the propulsion engines.

Here's another hint for you: THEY SHOWED FAKE VIDEOS ON TV. It doesn't matter whether or not you show me some grey smoke on some planted evidence. I can, and have, proven that the 9/11 videos they aired are fake, including the CNN Best Angle shot.


What you think is guaranteed evidence of fakery and what everyone else thinks is are to different things, and so far not one of your films I've seen has proved anything. One had footage from above the WT and you cant see a plane, well considering it's approaching at high speed, is dark against a dark background (the river/harbour), what do you expect to see?

Showing me phony planted evidence all day long will not turn a fake video into a real video.
They sold thousands of CNN America Rememebers DVD's. It even has a different fake soundtrack from what they aired.
You can show me a million pictures of whatever you want, and it won't make the fake CNN video real. Understand?


And maybe you could use the null hypothesis (well, thats what it was called in statistics at least) that it is real, against the hypothesis that it isn't, and work out if your images prove it wrong. So far, you seem to have a problem getting the angles right. And hy, after all the hassle of going through all that work do you think they would make such obvious mistakes as you feel they have?


reply posted on 5-6-2007 @ 12:23 PM by SR
Originally posted by bsregistration
So you're telling me it couldn't even crack the sidewalk, but it blew up the World Trade Center?

You're showing me a photograph of *what exactly* under a constuction canopy?

Maybe YOU should go to wikipedia and check out what an engine for UA175 looks like. Here's a hint: it's not the size of a trash can.

Here's another hint for you: THEY SHOWED FAKE VIDEOS ON TV. It doesn't matter whether or not you show me some grey smoke on some planted evidence. I can, and have, proven that the 9/11 videos they aired are fake, including the CNN Best Angle shot.

Showing me phony planted evidence all day long will not turn a fake video into a real video.

They sold thousands of CNN America Rememebers DVD's. It even has a different fake soundtrack from what they aired.

You can show me a million pictures of whatever you want, and it won't make the fake CNN video real. Understand?

The sound on the videos is fake also. See livevideo.com... or youtube.com... and check his work on audio fakery.






But wait they must of photoshopped that in or made the cracks while no one was looking...

I've already agreed with you LOL in another thread that i don't believe two 767's were used as there is problem with the engine details maybe a 737 maybe the research i've read is wrong i'm not that qualified on the subject of aviaonics to make that sort of absoulute judgement there is also problems within the movement with the pentagon claims also due to engine claims as well but anyway:

Yet I know full well what the engines look like but excuse me for not thinking it was in an explosive impact and supposedly flung three blocks..Again what does a car crash do...crumple.... now take that and apply it to a plane... especially with it only being the top part of the engine intieor anyway....

Excuse me that there was not enough evidence and that the engine was damaged too much for your liking but we don't all get what we want it doesn't make any claim more crediable just because someone demands that there should of been more evidence of this and that...Events and actions have many different possibilities and outcomes just because the one that happened is not the one you agree with doesn't mean it's wrong you use what you've got.

As many good people within the truth movement are using the actual evidence that there was and the findings in the report to actually discredit the event.

Your point of me not showing you more photos which couldn't have been faked in short time of mass quantity, different variations of quality, different timestamps and in so many different locations...clearly shows i should just quit as we'll just be going in circles instead of forward for the cause.

But good luck in future endevours bsregistration.









[edit on 5-6-2007 by SR]


reply posted on 5-6-2007 @ 12:31 PM by bsregistration
For more on why they didn't use planes check out killtown.blogspot.com...

and for proof that the videos are fake and that there are problems with the eyewitness accounts see 911logic.blogspot.com...

Nobody who has gone down to Battery Park in NYC has been able to take footage that matches the CNN Ghostplane footage. The buildings are out of position. The reason they're out-of-position has been identified.

I've posted video showing that the CNN video is fake from the very locations it was supposedly shot. It's a mess. Nobody has been able to duplicate the CNN shot and nobody will, unless they're cutting and pasting the skyline together the same way the 9/11 perps did.

It's that simple.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags