Originally posted by Essan
No scientific, physical, explanation of how it happens.
A few clues then?
Although it may sound paradoxical, it is possible for shock waves to be formed with electromagnetic radiation. As a charged particle travels
through an insulating medium, it disrupts the local electromagnetic field in the medium. Electrons in the atoms of the medium will be displaced and
polarised by the passing field of the charged particle, and photons are emitted as the electrons in the medium restore themselves to equilibrium after
the disruption has passed. (In a conductor, the equilibrium can be restored without emitting a photon.) In normal circumstances, these photons
destructively interfere with each other and no radiation is detected. However, if the disruption travels faster than the photons themselves travel, as
when a charged particle exceeds the speed of light in that medium, the photons constructively interfere and intensify the observed radiation. The
result (analogous to a sonic boom) is known as Cherenkov radiation.
en.wikipedia.org...
Radar Becomes A Weapon
Aviation Week & Space Technology September 5, 2005 Pg. 50
Knowledge that radar can produce violent effects on electronic systems is not new. More than 20 years ago, bomber aircraft radars were capable of
generating enough concentrated noise jamming to burn out the valve amps (tube amplifiers) in fighters attempting an interception. The emergence over
the last few years of the active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, and its ability to provide high average power for appreciable times, makes
such electronically destructive devices all the more attractive and effective.
"It's not wise to characterize all AESA radars as potential weapons," says an aerospace industry expert in advanced radars. "Most radars are for
defensive purposes only." Also, "one does not need an AESA to turn a radar into a weapon. It can be done with other technologies. High power is
required, but beyond that, it's mostly a software issue.
While HPM produces higher peak power, AESA often generates greater average power. That produces different operational and targeting strategies. For
example, Raytheon's airport protection system uses infrared sensors to find the target and determine where to focus its beam. It also produces
effects at longer range, possibly as much as 100 mi., because it produces powerful pulses of energy. AESA radar has the built-in ability to find and
track a target, so it can be held on the target for the necessary additional microseconds needed to create its weapons effect.
Some HPM pulses are designed to be very broadband, covering "many gigahertz" of frequencies, so they are more likely to find any opening or
vulnerability in a target, the radar specialist says. AESA radar has a narrower frequency range, but it uses its radar capability to identify a
target, search a library for its vulnerable frequencies and then tailor the signal for the specific target.
omega.twoday.net...
Tesla's system can produce a variety of wave propagations, pending the driving apparatus. Tesla believed that his wireless system would be better
than most other radio systems because transverse electromagnetic waves (whose behavior depends on its wavelength) would decay as they travelled from
the transmitter, making the signals uselessly weak at long distances. Tesla advanced that longitudinal electromagnetic waves (such as those that occur
in waves in plasmas) through the medium would be used, as he theorized that they would be practically lossless. His devices can be driven to produce
either transverse or longitudinal waves.
Besides his intention to transmit wireless signals of intelligence, he proposed to transmit electric power via electrical conduction through the Earth
and the upper atmosphere, as well as in between them both (in the Earth-ionosphere region which is now known as a resonant cavity). This power
transmission was to be done not by "hertzian waves", but through standing surface waves. Tesla’s proposed wireless transmitter utilized a resonant
transformer to apply a very high voltage of high frequency between the earth and a large elevated conductor, as discussed earlier.
en.wikipedia.org...:Anthony_Appleyard/Tesla's_role_in_the_history_of_radio
So we know that EM waves can do damage at a distance and we know that we have the means to focus such energy at a distance. Do we have a way to
efficiently focus enough energy over continental distances?
US researchers have outlined a relatively simple system that could deliver power to devices such as laptop computers or MP3 players without
wires.
The concept exploits century-old physics and could work over distances of many metres, the researchers said
The team from MIT is not the first group to suggest wireless energy transfer.
Nineteenth-century physicist and engineer Nikola Tesla experimented with long-range wireless energy transfer, but his most ambitious attempt - the 29m
high aerial known as Wardenclyffe Tower, in New York - failed when he ran out of money.
Physics promises wireless power
He lit vacuum tubes wirelessly at both of the New York locations, providing evidence for the potential of wireless power transmission.
en.wikipedia.org...
Could not track down the claim in the officially provided sources thought but i am quite sure that he did manage that feat even back then.
Here we have a press clipping with Khruschev being a typical Russian and caiming that they have a 'new weapon' just a few years before the Cuban
missile crisis...
"We have a new weapon, just within the portfolio of our scientists, so to speak, which is so powerful that, if unrestrainedly used, it could wipe
out all life on earth. It is a fantastic weapon." Khrushchev, to the Presidium, Jan. 1960
"I'm not looking forward to this trip," Bush said as he toured Alabama and Mississippi and headed for Louisiana. "It's as if the entire Gulf
Coast were obliterated by the worst kind of weapon you can imagine," he said.
www.weatherwars.info...
Now Bearden thinks the Kremlin guys may have thought their weapons would have been good enough to force some short range missiles into Cuba but it
seems it did not work and they had to back off.
You might not consider Beardens operational history of these weapons as credible but i think the pieces are not hard to put together if one wishes to
find a credible explanation for weather phenomenon that we can not currently explain.
www.cheniere.org...
Tell me what you think as i have very many more pieces that might help to flesh out the puzzle if your not seeing a clear picture just yet.
But how? How can an electromagnetic waves alter the climate, or cause earthquakes or volcanic eruptions? I want a geophysical explanation of
how it's possible.
The weather is largely the result of the energy flow between the planet and the sun and with the correct and accurate application of energy why should
we expect that we can not alter the climate or do the things the defense secretary said were now being done?
Then I'll worry about how we actually come up with a method of producing it (preferably without involving the ionosphere which would mean
serious constraints in where and when such actions can be carried out, given the nature of what the ionosphere is 
)
The Ionosphere is mostly a mirror that can be charged to apply wireless energy over the horizon.
Neither do I. But that's the only serious, deliberate, weather modification that definitely goes on and which has been used for military
purposes (and subsequently banned)
I don't understand the qualification? I am suggesting ( actually Tom Bearden is) that the Russian KGB/FSB are operating a arsenal of direct energy
weapons that can transmit and focus energy to any point on, in or above the Earth? The defense secretary says that it's the 'terrorist' but i
don't believe one really builds 2 billion dollar submarines to land special forces on beaches so they may catch terrorist. I also don't think
'terrorist' operates air superiority figthers that requires F-22's to deal with...
Ah, but the British were using witchcraft to control the weather for military purposes back in the 16th century!
Just image what we can do now
Oh i can easily imagine some of the things we are doing now considering what apparently already required treaties to 'deal with' in 1976.
www.sunshine-project.org...
Interesting that said treaty were agreed to in the same year as that devastating earthquake in China. Warning shot to the show the US what could and
would happen if they attempted to act against the USSR?
The Russian Woodpecker was a notorious Soviet signal that could be heard on the shortwave radio bands worldwide between July 1976 and December
1989. It sounded like a sharp, repetitive tapping noise, at 10 Hz, giving rise to the "Woodpecker" name. The random frequency hops disrupted
legitimate broadcast, amateur radio, and utility transmissions and resulted in thousands of complaints by many countries worldwide.
en.wikipedia.org...
The woodpecker system started up in July 1976 but the following may in fact just be one of those 'coincidences' one will have to believe in for lack
of alternatives...
