This is ludicrous, if you look at the time on the lower right hand corner, there is 4 minutes between the jumps, of course the perspective is going to change in those 4 minutes with a copter flying around.

The reason why it is banned at those sites is anyone can see how laughable this is and serious investigators dont want to be associated with it.

This is edited to suit someones agenda. There is nothing at all to see.

Originally posted by Balboa
What's going on with the timestamp on the video? It jumps around at various points in the video. Isn't that evidence of something fishy?

Yeah, the person who made this video edited it to make it look like something was happening.

pyrolimeade

You can't say the distance of the bridge to WTC-2 is 119 ft, cause of the depth involved. It is much further back then that.

Also, if a straight line were to be drawn toward the camera from the bridge, anyone would quickly see what is happening, as the straight line would not be at all in line with the helicopter nor the camera. We can't do this of course due to it being a 2 dimensional image.

The camera in the last sequence is closer and in a different position causing the illusion.

Whomever did this film has tried to intentionally deceive people.

bsregistration


There is a major problem i have with everything you post. You use footage from places like youtube and googe video. This footage could have been tampered with so that people like you latch onto it. You are trusting videos from a site where anyone can upload it! I could go and edit something myself now so that it looks well, like it's been edited.

Few people on this site are idiots, most like decent evidence, and i'm afraid that some videos which we cannot verify as being original and unedited simply won't cut it.

I think this is another attempt by a bored teenager, rather lacking in intelligence to make the people on sites like this look like nutters.

The suggestion that I'm Nico Haupt is silly. YOU'RE NICO HAUPT!

The bridge can't be seen from that angle. It's fake video, plain and simple. Go find an aerial shot of the Verrazono Bridge and look how far it is from the city.

If you're so thick that you think everything you see on TV is real I cannot help you. If you don't believe me, check it out in Google Earth. Show how you can see the Verrazano Bridge from there. The video is fake.

It's in any archive of ABC's live coverage you want to look at and it a similar special effect has been pointed out in the Naudet video 9/11.

You can claim tampering all you like, but that's what they aired on 9/11 and it's fake. If you have a "real" tape of ABC's live coverage that contradicts it go ahead and post it. You don't and you want. We both know that.

Do you believe in WMD in Iraq? Powell and Bush said they were there. Why is it OK to believe those were fake? Because the TV told you they were fake?

The bridge shot (showing the bridge in 2 different places where it doesn't belong) proves the ABC footage is fake. Go post some video of the Verrazano Bridge and you'll see. It doesn't belong there.

Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
bsregistration


There is a major problem i have with everything you post. You use footage from places like youtube and googe video. This footage could have been tampered with so that people like you latch onto it. You are trusting videos from a site where anyone can upload it! I could go and edit something myself now so that it looks well, like it's been edited.

Few people on this site are idiots, most like decent evidence, and i'm afraid that some videos which we cannot verify as being original and unedited simply won't cut it.

I think this is another attempt by a bored teenager, rather lacking in intelligence to make the people on sites like this look like nutters.

While Microsoft Flight Sim might not the best judge, it does set up the shot nicely. Out of curiousity, which bridge is that to settle the dispute the Brooklyn or Varrazano-Narrows?

Bsregistration

You seem to have missed my point. I am saying the videos you are showing are fake, but not in the way you mean. I think they were faked to make it look like they were fake. I cannot find an official one at the moment, if someone can help there it would be nice.

As for WMD's, no i dn't believe what i hear on tv, i believe there wern't weapons because numerous official bodies other than our governments said there wern't. But lets not get into a seperate discussion on such things.

I don't believe in everything i see on tv, and i most certainly don't believe in everything i see online, unlike you it seems.

Show me a video from an official source, that being the news agencies website or somewhere else we can accept as being the unedited footage. If you can do that and the same errors are there, then i will take you very seriously.

Honestly give me an original source with these errors and i will apologise and then start seriously researching this.