It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jose Escamilla's new film: Interstellar

page: 5
8
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 04:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by free_spirit

Originally posted by Gridkeeper

Originally posted by Diplomat
GridKeeper you are just an attention whore. You are James Casbolt's friend right? Well then you have no credibility whatsoever and shouldn't even be on this board. People like you and Casbolt are a disgrace.


Have you even bothered to watch any of my videos? They are free you know.


I just watched your videoclip titled UFO Interstellar Video Footage.
These images are from Jose Escamilla's trailer film Interstellar
so it's clear you just copied them. Not only that but you changed
Jose's original music placing music by other artist and you have
no right to do so.

But you Gridkeeper also are claiming copyrights to this film by
placing a 2007 copyright to a santamonicajohn with a hotmail
address. From a legal view Jose Escamilla is the copyright owner
of his film as writer, composer, arranger, producer and director
and this copyright can't be alterated, am I right ?

Therefore you are comitting not only a copyright infringement
but also a felony by stealing copyrighted images and claiming
your own copyright in your edited videoclip. Can you explain
why are you doing this ?

Here is the evidence.




Can you explain who santamonicajohn is ? Or is it you maybe ?
Can you explain why you are not mentioning Jose Escamilla
in your videoclip despite the fact that he is the creator of the
film ? I must say that I'm shocked by seeing your action in
damage to my friend Jose Escamilla and I'm very disconcerted
so I ask you to explain these issues.

Am I wrong here ? You tell me Mr. Gridkeeper if you will because
in my judgement something is very wrong with you unless you
make a clearificatiobn. I just talked to Jose Escamilla by phone
and he is also very dissapointed to learn about this and he don't
know who you are. Can you tell us where did you get those images
and explain the santamonicajohn 2007 copyright issue ?

I will wait for your response to our inquiry. Be honest with us.



Yes you are wrong. You say you spoke to Jose? He said he never heard of SJ did he? You are not in the loop then are you? Tell me what's the email address on the released still pictures? Are you really a afriend of Jose or are you just trying to get people to release information that does not wish to be released? You have no right to judge me, none of you do.

Gridkeeper.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 11:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Stari
 


Cool thats exciting I'm looking forward to the reviews of this movie, If they're good I'll buy the dammed thing!!



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Just one question about the trailer. Why the cam shaking? Added drama effect?

[edit on 22/8/2007 by PsykoOps]


Hand held camera.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Hi free-spirit, I have no hard feelings toward you, I believe you have just put 2 and 2 together and come up with 3. I believe your intentions are good. Did you really speak with Jose or were you trying to bluff me out?
It's no ones business who santamonicajohn is, no ones but smj himself.


Premiere now open: www.tbln.com...

I would say give Jose my regards but that's not necessary, ask Jose why if you don't believe me.

Toodle doo,

Gridkeeper.

To all the people who have purposely slated and attacked me either because they are paid to or they do not understand what is happening right now, I forgive you, GKXXX.

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Gridkeeper] spelling.

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Gridkeeper]



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridkeeper
 


Yeah I figured as much, but why isn't it on a tripod. I mean those things dont cost that much. And why is he filming these images with a camera anyway, why not just show the digital jpeg. Editing isn't that hard these days.
Anyone know btw if he is filming his monitor, printed pictures or what?



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 04:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Yeah I figured as much, but why isn't it on a tripod. I mean those things dont cost that much.


I do not know how these images where taken although I was under the impression that it was done wth a telescope.

I am an amature astronomer with a 6" telescope. I know that while I am outside and watching the sky through my scope if there is even the slightest wind it will shake the image I see.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Yeah but that shake looks like handheld, and I doubt anyone shoots trough a telescope with a handheld camera

I was under the assumption that he filmed images taken by John Lenard that were either on a monitor or printed.

[edit on 22/8/2007 by PsykoOps]



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 05:46 PM
link   
Ok so I jsut watched Interstellar and If its not a hoax then Im truley stuck for words ..... if its not a hoax then we have giant ships orbiting earth full stop, either that or some kind of morphing plasma space whales......I really am stunned, Im gonna dedicate some real time into researching this as I just cant beleive what im seeing.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 07:33 PM
link   
The second Interstellar trailer on Jose's youtube page.



[edit on 22-8-2007 by Gridkeeper]

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Gridkeeper]



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Diplomat
 


Reaction of a human mind, trying to handle celestial and ET creations.
Totally understandable, but I think you are off-track my friend



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 08:36 PM
link   
reply to post by gonquin
 

WHy are you surprised?
We have nasa footage showing many miles wide UFO already...
I wouldn't be surprised they had ships the size of our planet.
ETD.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Gridkeeper
 


What makes me doubt these are real ET craft, is that I don't see why they would stay in the visible spectrum if they don't need to.

This is either real footage and we are near a real Disclosure, or the footage is CGI.
ETD.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Did you pay for a single watch??
Where is the NASA footage of huge UFO's you speak of?
and I havent seen the movie, but a reply to what you said, even if the footage is real, that in no way means we are near disclosure. For all we know every video taken of ufo's could have been real and this has happened for how many years with no disclosure... one movie wont change that.



posted on Aug, 22 2007 @ 11:17 PM
link   
Why do both of the trailer clips in this thread look like someone
sneezed into a petri dish and then used a microscope to film the
live bacteria therein? That grandiose music gives the impression
that something truly mindboggling is about to appear, but it never
does. Just more bacteria, LOL.



posted on Aug, 23 2007 @ 04:33 AM
link   
the fact that this isnt all over the media means one of two things

1. Its a hoax.
2. The media is not allowed to show this footage.

I await the experts opinion however the video name drops quotes on the footage from Cambridge proffs and NASA guys..... I cant beleive this thread isnt 50 pages long when ridiculous threads get so much attention , is the board asleep ?



posted on Aug, 23 2007 @ 07:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by carewemust
Why do both of the trailer clips in this thread look like someone
sneezed into a petri dish and then used a microscope to film the
live bacteria therein? That grandiose music gives the impression
that something truly mindboggling is about to appear, but it never
does. Just more bacteria, LOL.


They don't, your concious mind hasn't anything to compare this to so it picks the closest thing. Most people say a microscope, go have a look at some videos that are looking down microscopes and I bet you will NEVER find one that you can compare to this, impossible.



posted on Aug, 23 2007 @ 07:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by gonquin
the fact that this isnt all over the media means one of two things

1. Its a hoax.
2. The media is not allowed to show this footage.

I await the experts opinion however the video name drops quotes on the footage from Cambridge proffs and NASA guys..... I cant beleive this thread isnt 50 pages long when ridiculous threads get so much attention , is the board asleep ?


The media are not allowed to show this footage. They won't touch it.

GK.



posted on Aug, 23 2007 @ 04:41 PM
link   
I have to say after observing the sky with my telescope for a long time and using filters to eliminate star light to see another. And going by the way it's focused in and moved, if these objects are as far away as he Jose says they are. Then I could understand why the telescope that has a video camera device mounted to it would move constantly.

If you have a GPS or Star finder on your telescope, and if you looked through one enough, sometimes you will have to make manual adjustments that are very sensitive. The farther away the object, the slightest little turn of the knob can throw you way off.

As far as the colors go, maybe they were using filters so they can see the objects better. Sometimes there are so many stars in the sky, you need to have a filter to eliminate particular star light the could interfere with the object you are trying to look at.

I do have to say, in the trailer, one of the previewed objects almost looks like that ship from the movie "The Chronicles of Riddick".

I would not call this one a hoax quite yet, but its fascinating to watch. And please, keep in mind I consider myself an amateur when it comes to viewing the night sky. But I am good enough to point out constellations and keep my bearings straight.



posted on Aug, 23 2007 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by TheInfamousOne
 


The use of filters might be part of the technique behind the so-called
apparatus (which will also be offered for sale) used in conjunction with
the camera and the telescope.

If I found a technique to tape these things I would offer the explanation
for free everyone to use including hours of raw video.
This commercial thing makes me suspicious.



posted on Aug, 25 2007 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Believe it or not, it comes down to the fact that people need to eat and pay the bills.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join