trip to area 51, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 28-8-2007 @ 10:05 PM by mrjenka
I have been away for a year. I came back to see what's new and nothing has changed. Absolutely nothing at all....

Still same ole' Area 51 discussions. Same ole' same ole'. I said it once and will say it again.

1) If your wacky plans full of airplanes, marines etc... worked the second the "base" would be infiltrated a button is pressed and the WHOLE place gets locked down. NO ONE IN, NO ONE OUT!!!

So, even if you made it "in" you wouldn't get far. You would be locked out. And all that juicy stuff you guys are clamoring for even if it was there(I am not saying it is or not) you wouldn't even be able to get to or see because it is so securely hidden "inside" that the only way to get in is with 2 retinal scans, than 2 other people with id cards, than 2 other people with finger prints. And those 6 people know nothing whats inside, all the know is they are a "piece" to opening a "door", "vault" or whatever it maybe. So, you need nothing short than a direct nuclear strike which would blow that whole place to pieces and expose all those dirty little secrets(IF there were any, again, I am not saying there are)....

And how stupid would you feel if all you found in the rubbish were experimental planes and materials.

Pretty dumb huh?


2) Why is everyone so hung up on Area 51, people that work there or work for defense contractors(like myself, lockheed, i knew you'd ask) and are "associated" with projects don't even call it area 51 or any of that junk. Common "cooler" talk is poking fun at the Area 51 nuts.......

3) Now, if you really want "juicy" secrets there is no better place than LOS ALAMOS LABORATORY!!!!!!!

I can't emphasize this enough. Forget area 51, focus on Los Alamos...... Wh does no one ever question that place... Why does no one ever question what goes on there??

To hide something it is not always best to hide it in a "secret" place like area 51(it's not so secret now) but to hide it in plain site. Why is this you ask?

Because, people always want to know what is behind the "closed" door, however, they will walk right by the door that is semi-open......

Think about it........


reply posted on 29-8-2007 @ 02:08 AM by gariac
reply to post by mrjenka



Pretty tough to fly secret planes at Los Alamos. I've been to the area. Some of the technical areas are not very private.

I really doubt much beyond nuclear projects is going on there. In fact, LLNL has more privacy.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Old Forgotten Bunker?
  Posted 19 days ago with 4 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags